From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
Stefan Seyfried <stefan.seyfried@googlemail.com>,
X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, entry: Check for syscall exit work with IRQs disabled
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 21:08:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150324200810.GA3753@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <189320d42b4d671df78c10555976bb10af1ffc75.1427137498.git.luto@kernel.org>
* Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:
> We currently have a race: if we're preempted during syscall exit, we
> can fail to process syscall return work that is queued up while
> we're preempted in ret_from_sys_call after checking ti.flags.
>
> Fix it by disabling interrupts before checking ti.flags.
>
> Fixes: 96b6352c1271 x86_64, entry: Remove the syscall exit audit and schedule optimizations
> Reported-by: Stefan Seyfried <stefan.seyfried@googlemail.com>
> Reported-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> ---
>
> Ingo, I don't understand the LOCKDEP_SYS_EXIT stuff. Can you take a quick
> look to confirm that it's okay to call it more than once?
So the essence is that it wants to print this warning if we are
holding a lock after a syscall:
printk("[ BUG: lock held when returning to user space! ]\n");
it manipulates no state and is not sensitive to whether it's called
before or after return-work processing.
> arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S | 18 ++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> index 1d74d161687c..2babb393915e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> @@ -364,12 +364,21 @@ system_call_fastpath:
> * Has incomplete stack frame and undefined top of stack.
> */
> ret_from_sys_call:
> - testl $_TIF_ALLWORK_MASK,TI_flags+THREAD_INFO(%rsp,RIP-ARGOFFSET)
> - jnz int_ret_from_sys_call_fixup /* Go the the slow path */
> -
> LOCKDEP_SYS_EXIT
> DISABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_NONE)
> TRACE_IRQS_OFF
> +
> + /*
> + * We must check ti flags with interrupts (or at least preemption)
> + * off because we must *never* return to userspace without
> + * processing exit work that is enqueued if we're preempted here.
> + * In particular, returning to userspace with any of the one-shot
> + * flags (TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME, TIF_USER_RETURN_NOTIFY, etc) set is
> + * very bad.
> + */
> + testl $_TIF_ALLWORK_MASK,TI_flags+THREAD_INFO(%rsp,RIP-ARGOFFSET)
> + jnz int_ret_from_sys_call_fixup /* Go the the slow path */
Should be safe to call it once again after user-work processing has
been finished.
I've picked up your fix for tip:x86/urgent.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-24 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-15 8:17 PANIC: double fault, error_code: 0x0 in 4.0.0-rc3-2, kvm related? Stefan Seyfried
2015-03-18 14:16 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-03-18 15:05 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-03-18 17:43 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-03-18 17:46 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-03-18 18:03 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-18 19:03 ` Stefan Seyfried
2015-03-18 19:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-18 20:05 ` Stefan Seyfried
2015-03-18 20:51 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-18 21:12 ` Stefan Seyfried
2015-03-18 21:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-18 21:41 ` Stefan Seyfried
2015-03-18 21:49 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-18 21:53 ` Stefan Seyfried
2015-03-18 20:06 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-18 20:49 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-18 21:06 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-18 21:17 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-18 21:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-18 21:42 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-18 21:55 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-18 22:17 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-18 22:20 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-18 22:27 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-18 22:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-18 22:24 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-18 22:22 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-03-18 22:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-18 22:29 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-18 22:29 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-18 22:38 ` Stefan Seyfried
2015-03-18 22:40 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-18 23:22 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-19 0:23 ` Stefan Seyfried
2015-03-19 0:57 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-19 2:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-19 6:24 ` Stefan Seyfried
2015-03-19 10:16 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-03-19 10:58 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-19 11:21 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-03-19 12:48 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-19 13:47 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-03-19 14:55 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-03-19 15:22 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-03-19 15:41 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-19 15:51 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-03-19 16:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-20 18:16 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-20 18:50 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-03-23 9:02 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-03-23 9:35 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-03-23 13:22 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-03-23 16:07 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-23 17:18 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-03-23 17:46 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-23 18:43 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-03-23 18:38 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-23 18:48 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-23 18:59 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-03-23 19:10 ` [PATCH] x86, entry: Check for syscall exit work with IRQs disabled Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-23 19:21 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-23 19:27 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-23 19:32 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-24 11:17 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-03-24 20:08 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-03-25 0:35 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-25 12:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-25 15:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-25 9:13 ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry: " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-23 18:54 ` PANIC: double fault, error_code: 0x0 in 4.0.0-rc3-2, kvm related? Stefan Seyfried
2015-03-23 18:56 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-03-23 19:07 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-23 19:10 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-19 13:21 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-18 21:49 ` Stefan Seyfried
2015-03-28 23:57 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150324200810.GA3753@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=stefan.seyfried@googlemail.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.