From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Joe Mario <jmario@redhat.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tool: Fix ppid for synthesized fork events
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:24:05 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150325132405.GB13759@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5512A88A.1010608@redhat.com>
Em Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 08:22:34AM -0400, Joe Mario escreveu:
> On 03/24/2015 05:12 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> >On 3/24/15 2:10 PM, Don Zickus wrote:
> >>He does this with and without the patch. The difference is usually
> >>over 50% extra time with the patch for both the record timings and
> >>report timings.:-(
> >I find that shocking. The patch only populates ppid and ptid with a
> >value read from the file that is already opened and processed. Most
> >of the patch is just plumbing the value from the low level function
> >that processes the status file back to synthesize_fork.
> >What benchmark is this? Is it something I can download and run? if so, details? site, command, args?
> Hi David:
> We ran "time perf mem record -a -e cpu/mem-loads,ldlat=50/pp -e
> cpu/mem-stores/pp sleep 10" on a system that was running SPECjbb2013
> in the background. There were about 10,000 java threads with about
> 500 to 800 in a runnable state at any given time. We ran it on a 4
> socket x86 IVB server.
So it starts when there are tons of threads in the system, for which
synthezing from /proc will have to take place, without looking again at
that patch, I can't think about what would be a problem :-\
> We had two perf binaries. One with your patch and one without it.
> Because the benchmark doesn't always have a constant load, we ran the
> above perf command in a loop alternating between the patched and
> unpatched version. The elapsed wall clock times ("real" field from
> time) for the perf with your patch was typically >= 50% longer than
> the equivalent unpatched perf.
> We can't give out a copy of the SPEC benchmark (part of the SPEC
> agreement). Try to find some application (or create your own) to load
> the system with lots of busy threads.
Haven't tried, but head this is something that could perhaps be useful
here:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~cking/stress-ng/
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-25 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-19 17:41 [PATCH] perf tool: Fix ppid for synthesized fork events David Ahern
2015-03-19 20:56 ` Don Zickus
2015-03-19 21:06 ` David Ahern
2015-03-20 14:01 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-03-24 20:10 ` Don Zickus
2015-03-24 21:12 ` David Ahern
2015-03-25 12:22 ` Joe Mario
2015-03-25 13:24 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2015-03-25 15:03 ` David Ahern
2015-03-25 19:20 ` Don Zickus
2015-03-25 16:57 ` David Ahern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150325132405.GB13759@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=jmario@redhat.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.