From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:33:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:52257 "EHLO linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S27009770AbbCYQdhCBoY7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:33:37 +0100 Received: from scotty.linux-mips.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.14.9/8.14.8) with ESMTP id t2PGXb2Z010012; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:33:37 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t2PGXaC3010011; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:33:36 +0100 Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:33:36 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Helmut Schaa Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Gabor Juhos Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath79: Increase max memory limit to 256MByte Message-ID: <20150325163336.GA9705@linux-mips.org> References: <1418904340-13464-1-git-send-email-helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 46523 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 04:39:33PM +0100, Helmut Schaa wrote: > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Helmut Schaa > wrote: > > At least QCA955x can handle up to 256MBytes. > > > > Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa > > --- > > > > Only tested on QCA955x, not sure if this would affect older SoCs in some way. > > Any objections to this? In the meantime I was able to test on AR9344 > as well (with 128MByte of RAM). The holdup has rather been that none of the folks who normally handle ath79 has commented. The patch is looking ok - but I can't test it. Patch applied. Thanks, Ralf