From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: "Russell King" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"Jakub Kiciński" <moorray3@wp.pl>,
"Andre Przywara" <Andre.Przywara@arm.com>,
"Andrew Jackson" <Andrew.Jackson@arm.com>,
"Graeme Gregory" <gg@slimlogic.co.uk>,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
"popcorn mix" <popcornmix@gmail.com>,
"Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz" <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/*] serial/amba-pl011: Activate TX IRQ passively
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 22:30:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150326213014.GA21687@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1427307746-2811-1-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 06:22:26PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> Thanks to Jakub Kiciński for his bug report and discussion, and for
> showing out how we can manage without the softirq (and providing a
> patch, though merging my rework with it got difficult, so I don't
> include it in the series now).
>
>
> There are two alternate versions of the series threaded from this cover
> letter:
>
> * [PATCH v3] - patch against v4.0-rc5 that supersedes the previous
> series; this is the less churny option.
>
> * [PATCH v3, tty-next..] - patches against tty-next that
> modify/partially revert the previous series without needing a
> rebase.
>
> Take your pick.
I have no idea what you want me to do here, sorry.
I need to apply patches to tty-next, I can't do anything against a
"clean" 4.0-rc5 as your patches are already in tty-next.
And I can't tell the two series apart here...
Can you just resend what you want me to apply to tty-next and we can go
from there?
confused,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (Greg Kroah-Hartman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/*] serial/amba-pl011: Activate TX IRQ passively
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 22:30:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150326213014.GA21687@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1427307746-2811-1-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 06:22:26PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> Thanks to Jakub Kici?ski for his bug report and discussion, and for
> showing out how we can manage without the softirq (and providing a
> patch, though merging my rework with it got difficult, so I don't
> include it in the series now).
>
>
> There are two alternate versions of the series threaded from this cover
> letter:
>
> * [PATCH v3] - patch against v4.0-rc5 that supersedes the previous
> series; this is the less churny option.
>
> * [PATCH v3, tty-next..] - patches against tty-next that
> modify/partially revert the previous series without needing a
> rebase.
>
> Take your pick.
I have no idea what you want me to do here, sorry.
I need to apply patches to tty-next, I can't do anything against a
"clean" 4.0-rc5 as your patches are already in tty-next.
And I can't tell the two series apart here...
Can you just resend what you want me to apply to tty-next and we can go
from there?
confused,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-26 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-25 18:22 [PATCH v3 0/*] serial/amba-pl011: Activate TX IRQ passively Dave Martin
2015-03-25 18:22 ` Dave Martin
2015-03-25 18:25 ` [PATCH v3 0/1] " Dave Martin
2015-03-25 18:25 ` Dave Martin
2015-03-25 18:25 ` [PATCH v3] " Dave Martin
2015-03-25 18:25 ` Dave Martin
2015-03-25 18:26 ` [PATCH v3, tty-next.. 0/2] " Dave Martin
2015-03-25 18:26 ` Dave Martin
2015-03-25 18:26 ` [PATCH v3, tty-next.. 1/2] Revert "serial/amba-pl011: Leave the TX IRQ alone when the UART is not open" Dave Martin
2015-03-25 18:26 ` Dave Martin
2015-03-25 18:26 ` [PATCH v3, tty-next.. 2/2] serial/amba-pl011: Activate TX IRQ passively Dave Martin
2015-03-25 18:26 ` Dave Martin
2015-03-26 21:30 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2015-03-26 21:30 ` [PATCH v3 0/*] " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-03-27 14:51 ` Dave Martin
2015-03-27 14:51 ` Dave Martin
2015-03-27 20:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-27 20:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-30 12:02 ` Dave P Martin
2015-03-30 12:02 ` Dave P Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150326213014.GA21687@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Andre.Przywara@arm.com \
--cc=Andrew.Jackson@arm.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=gg@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=moorray3@wp.pl \
--cc=popcornmix@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.