From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752938AbbC0H4p (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2015 03:56:45 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:35046 "EHLO mail-wg0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751698AbbC0H4m (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2015 03:56:42 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 08:56:37 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Nicholas Mc Guire , Valdis Kletnieks , Peter Zijlstra , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: completion: context, scope and language fixes Message-ID: <20150327075637.GD4587@gmail.com> References: <1424453328-26488-1-git-send-email-hofrat@osadl.org> <20150326112557.37602355@lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150326112557.37602355@lwn.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 12:28:48 -0500 > Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: > > > This hopfully address all of the issues Ingo Molnar noted > > in https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/18/690. > > This looks OK to me, modulo some small English quibbles. Ingo, does this > satisfy your concerns? I wasn't Cc:-ed to the patch and it wasn't Cc:-ed to lkml either :-( (It would be very useful if documentation update patches were Cc:-ed to the maintainers of the affected subsystem, to double check things and so.) Thanks, Ingo