All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [GIT PULL] locking fix
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 11:07:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150328100745.GA11790@gmail.com> (raw)

Linus,

Please pull the latest locking-urgent-for-linus git tree from:

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git locking-urgent-for-linus

   # HEAD: 35a9393c95b31870a74f51a3e7455f33f5657b6f lockdep: Fix the module unload key range freeing logic

A module unload lockdep race fix.

 Thanks,

	Ingo

------------------>
Peter Zijlstra (1):
      lockdep: Fix the module unload key range freeing logic


 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 kernel/module.c          |  8 ++---
 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 88d0d4420ad2..ba77ab5f64dd 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -633,7 +633,7 @@ static int count_matching_names(struct lock_class *new_class)
 	if (!new_class->name)
 		return 0;
 
-	list_for_each_entry(class, &all_lock_classes, lock_entry) {
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(class, &all_lock_classes, lock_entry) {
 		if (new_class->key - new_class->subclass == class->key)
 			return class->name_version;
 		if (class->name && !strcmp(class->name, new_class->name))
@@ -700,10 +700,12 @@ look_up_lock_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass)
 	hash_head = classhashentry(key);
 
 	/*
-	 * We can walk the hash lockfree, because the hash only
-	 * grows, and we are careful when adding entries to the end:
+	 * We do an RCU walk of the hash, see lockdep_free_key_range().
 	 */
-	list_for_each_entry(class, hash_head, hash_entry) {
+	if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled()))
+		return NULL;
+
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(class, hash_head, hash_entry) {
 		if (class->key == key) {
 			/*
 			 * Huh! same key, different name? Did someone trample
@@ -728,7 +730,8 @@ register_lock_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, int force)
 	struct lockdep_subclass_key *key;
 	struct list_head *hash_head;
 	struct lock_class *class;
-	unsigned long flags;
+
+	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled());
 
 	class = look_up_lock_class(lock, subclass);
 	if (likely(class))
@@ -750,28 +753,26 @@ register_lock_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, int force)
 	key = lock->key->subkeys + subclass;
 	hash_head = classhashentry(key);
 
-	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
 	if (!graph_lock()) {
-		raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 		return NULL;
 	}
 	/*
 	 * We have to do the hash-walk again, to avoid races
 	 * with another CPU:
 	 */
-	list_for_each_entry(class, hash_head, hash_entry)
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(class, hash_head, hash_entry) {
 		if (class->key == key)
 			goto out_unlock_set;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Allocate a new key from the static array, and add it to
 	 * the hash:
 	 */
 	if (nr_lock_classes >= MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS) {
 		if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock()) {
-			raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 			return NULL;
 		}
-		raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 
 		print_lockdep_off("BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS too low!");
 		dump_stack();
@@ -798,7 +799,6 @@ register_lock_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, int force)
 
 	if (verbose(class)) {
 		graph_unlock();
-		raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 
 		printk("\nnew class %p: %s", class->key, class->name);
 		if (class->name_version > 1)
@@ -806,15 +806,12 @@ register_lock_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, int force)
 		printk("\n");
 		dump_stack();
 
-		raw_local_irq_save(flags);
 		if (!graph_lock()) {
-			raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 			return NULL;
 		}
 	}
 out_unlock_set:
 	graph_unlock();
-	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 
 out_set_class_cache:
 	if (!subclass || force)
@@ -870,11 +867,9 @@ static int add_lock_to_list(struct lock_class *class, struct lock_class *this,
 	entry->distance = distance;
 	entry->trace = *trace;
 	/*
-	 * Since we never remove from the dependency list, the list can
-	 * be walked lockless by other CPUs, it's only allocation
-	 * that must be protected by the spinlock. But this also means
-	 * we must make new entries visible only once writes to the
-	 * entry become visible - hence the RCU op:
+	 * Both allocation and removal are done under the graph lock; but
+	 * iteration is under RCU-sched; see look_up_lock_class() and
+	 * lockdep_free_key_range().
 	 */
 	list_add_tail_rcu(&entry->entry, head);
 
@@ -1025,7 +1020,9 @@ static int __bfs(struct lock_list *source_entry,
 		else
 			head = &lock->class->locks_before;
 
-		list_for_each_entry(entry, head, entry) {
+		DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled());
+
+		list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, head, entry) {
 			if (!lock_accessed(entry)) {
 				unsigned int cq_depth;
 				mark_lock_accessed(entry, lock);
@@ -2022,7 +2019,7 @@ static inline int lookup_chain_cache(struct task_struct *curr,
 	 * We can walk it lock-free, because entries only get added
 	 * to the hash:
 	 */
-	list_for_each_entry(chain, hash_head, entry) {
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(chain, hash_head, entry) {
 		if (chain->chain_key == chain_key) {
 cache_hit:
 			debug_atomic_inc(chain_lookup_hits);
@@ -2996,8 +2993,18 @@ void lockdep_init_map(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name,
 	if (unlikely(!debug_locks))
 		return;
 
-	if (subclass)
+	if (subclass) {
+		unsigned long flags;
+
+		if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->lockdep_recursion))
+			return;
+
+		raw_local_irq_save(flags);
+		current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
 		register_lock_class(lock, subclass, 1);
+		current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
+		raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
+	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lockdep_init_map);
 
@@ -3887,9 +3894,17 @@ static inline int within(const void *addr, void *start, unsigned long size)
 	return addr >= start && addr < start + size;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Used in module.c to remove lock classes from memory that is going to be
+ * freed; and possibly re-used by other modules.
+ *
+ * We will have had one sync_sched() before getting here, so we're guaranteed
+ * nobody will look up these exact classes -- they're properly dead but still
+ * allocated.
+ */
 void lockdep_free_key_range(void *start, unsigned long size)
 {
-	struct lock_class *class, *next;
+	struct lock_class *class;
 	struct list_head *head;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int i;
@@ -3905,7 +3920,7 @@ void lockdep_free_key_range(void *start, unsigned long size)
 		head = classhash_table + i;
 		if (list_empty(head))
 			continue;
-		list_for_each_entry_safe(class, next, head, hash_entry) {
+		list_for_each_entry_rcu(class, head, hash_entry) {
 			if (within(class->key, start, size))
 				zap_class(class);
 			else if (within(class->name, start, size))
@@ -3916,11 +3931,25 @@ void lockdep_free_key_range(void *start, unsigned long size)
 	if (locked)
 		graph_unlock();
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
+
+	/*
+	 * Wait for any possible iterators from look_up_lock_class() to pass
+	 * before continuing to free the memory they refer to.
+	 *
+	 * sync_sched() is sufficient because the read-side is IRQ disable.
+	 */
+	synchronize_sched();
+
+	/*
+	 * XXX at this point we could return the resources to the pool;
+	 * instead we leak them. We would need to change to bitmap allocators
+	 * instead of the linear allocators we have now.
+	 */
 }
 
 void lockdep_reset_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock)
 {
-	struct lock_class *class, *next;
+	struct lock_class *class;
 	struct list_head *head;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int i, j;
@@ -3948,7 +3977,7 @@ void lockdep_reset_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock)
 		head = classhash_table + i;
 		if (list_empty(head))
 			continue;
-		list_for_each_entry_safe(class, next, head, hash_entry) {
+		list_for_each_entry_rcu(class, head, hash_entry) {
 			int match = 0;
 
 			for (j = 0; j < NR_LOCKDEP_CACHING_CLASSES; j++)
diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
index b3d634ed06c9..99fdf94efce8 100644
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -1865,7 +1865,7 @@ static void free_module(struct module *mod)
 	kfree(mod->args);
 	percpu_modfree(mod);
 
-	/* Free lock-classes: */
+	/* Free lock-classes; relies on the preceding sync_rcu(). */
 	lockdep_free_key_range(mod->module_core, mod->core_size);
 
 	/* Finally, free the core (containing the module structure) */
@@ -3349,9 +3349,6 @@ static int load_module(struct load_info *info, const char __user *uargs,
 	module_bug_cleanup(mod);
 	mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
 
-	/* Free lock-classes: */
-	lockdep_free_key_range(mod->module_core, mod->core_size);
-
 	/* we can't deallocate the module until we clear memory protection */
 	unset_module_init_ro_nx(mod);
 	unset_module_core_ro_nx(mod);
@@ -3375,6 +3372,9 @@ static int load_module(struct load_info *info, const char __user *uargs,
 	synchronize_rcu();
 	mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
  free_module:
+	/* Free lock-classes; relies on the preceding sync_rcu() */
+	lockdep_free_key_range(mod->module_core, mod->core_size);
+
 	module_deallocate(mod, info);
  free_copy:
 	free_copy(info);

             reply	other threads:[~2015-03-28 10:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-28 10:07 Ingo Molnar [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-05-03  7:43 [GIT PULL] locking fix Ingo Molnar
2026-05-03 16:59 ` pr-tracker-bot
2026-03-22  8:07 Ingo Molnar
2026-03-22 18:04 ` pr-tracker-bot
2026-03-01  8:53 Ingo Molnar
2026-03-01 21:37 ` pr-tracker-bot
2025-11-08 13:04 Ingo Molnar
2025-11-08 17:15 ` pr-tracker-bot
2025-09-07 10:16 Ingo Molnar
2025-09-07 15:32 ` pr-tracker-bot
2025-02-28 19:02 Ingo Molnar
2025-03-01  1:40 ` pr-tracker-bot
2025-02-08  9:08 Ingo Molnar
2025-02-08 20:07 ` pr-tracker-bot
2024-12-29  8:46 Ingo Molnar
2024-12-29 18:22 ` pr-tracker-bot
2024-06-08  7:35 Ingo Molnar
2024-06-08 16:50 ` pr-tracker-bot
2024-04-14  8:01 Ingo Molnar
2024-04-14 18:48 ` pr-tracker-bot
2023-11-26  9:39 Ingo Molnar
2023-11-26 17:16 ` pr-tracker-bot
2023-02-11  8:54 Ingo Molnar
2023-02-11 19:24 ` pr-tracker-bot
2021-03-28 10:28 Ingo Molnar
2021-03-28 19:22 ` pr-tracker-bot
2019-07-14 11:36 Ingo Molnar
2019-07-14 18:45 ` pr-tracker-bot
2019-05-16 16:01 Ingo Molnar
2019-05-16 17:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-16 18:39   ` Greg KH
2019-05-16 18:42     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-05-16 23:55       ` Sasha Levin
2019-05-17 12:16         ` Greg KH
2019-05-16 18:20 ` pr-tracker-bot
2019-04-12 11:53 Ingo Molnar
2019-04-13  4:05 ` pr-tracker-bot
2017-07-21 10:11 Ingo Molnar
2016-09-13 18:11 Ingo Molnar
2016-04-16  9:16 Ingo Molnar
2015-08-14  7:08 Ingo Molnar
2015-03-01 16:57 Ingo Molnar
2013-10-26 12:19 Ingo Molnar
2013-10-27 17:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-27 19:00   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2013-10-27 19:23     ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-27 19:35       ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-27 19:37       ` Maarten Lankhorst
2013-10-27 19:51         ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-27 19:56           ` Maarten Lankhorst
2013-10-27 19:59             ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-28  8:47               ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-15 17:02 Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150328100745.GA11790@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.