From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add DT support for netxbig LEDs Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:30:08 +0200 Message-ID: <20150330123008.GC17650@lunn.ch> References: <1424703861-20903-1-git-send-email-simon.guinot@sequanux.org> <20150309094107.GL1509@kw.sim.vm.gnt> <5506FE46.4000405@free-electrons.com> <20150330083040.GY1509@kw.sim.vm.gnt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([178.209.37.122]:33870 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752680AbbC3MeF (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2015 08:34:05 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150330083040.GY1509@kw.sim.vm.gnt> Sender: linux-leds-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org To: Simon Guinot Cc: Gregory CLEMENT , Bryan Wu , Richard Purdie , Jason Cooper , Sebastian Hesselbarth , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Donnefort On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:30:40AM +0200, Simon Guinot wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 05:01:10PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > On 09/03/2015 10:41, Simon Guinot wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 04:04:18PM +0100, Simon Guinot wrote: > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> This patch series adds DT support for the LEDs found on the Kirkwood-based > > >> LaCie boards 2Big and 5Big Network v2. > > >> > > >> Simon > > >> > > >> Simon Guinot (3): > > >> leds: netxbig: add device tree binding > > >> ARM: Kirkwood: add LED DT entries for netxbig boards > > >> ARM: mvebu: remove static LED setup for netxbig boards > > > > > > Hi Brian, > > > > > > Please, consider merging the first patch of this serie. > > > > Brian, > > > > here again let me know when this patch will be merged, and I will > > also need a stable tag as patch 2 depends on this one. > > > > Andrew, Jason, > > > > patch 2 and 3 looks OK for me. What is your opinion about it? > > Hi Gregory, Andrew and Jason, > > This patch set seems stuck. I believe that Bryan is probably too busy to > handle it... > > Is that possible to merge it via the mvebu tree ? Since only some LaCie > boards are impacted, I think it could make sense. Hi Simon Hard one. I also have a driver stuck in led limbo. Last time we took a fix via mvebu, it all went messy at the last minute. We made it very clear to Bryon we planned to take a patch via mvebu, we had queued it via mvebu, we had sent a pull request to arm-soc, all with no reply from Bryon. Only at the last minute did he jump in, pull it himself and send it to Linus. That caused Olof all sorts of problems with his tree. To stop that happening again, i think we need an Acked-by from Bryan. Andrew From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: andrew@lunn.ch (Andrew Lunn) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:30:08 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Add DT support for netxbig LEDs In-Reply-To: <20150330083040.GY1509@kw.sim.vm.gnt> References: <1424703861-20903-1-git-send-email-simon.guinot@sequanux.org> <20150309094107.GL1509@kw.sim.vm.gnt> <5506FE46.4000405@free-electrons.com> <20150330083040.GY1509@kw.sim.vm.gnt> Message-ID: <20150330123008.GC17650@lunn.ch> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:30:40AM +0200, Simon Guinot wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 05:01:10PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > On 09/03/2015 10:41, Simon Guinot wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 04:04:18PM +0100, Simon Guinot wrote: > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> This patch series adds DT support for the LEDs found on the Kirkwood-based > > >> LaCie boards 2Big and 5Big Network v2. > > >> > > >> Simon > > >> > > >> Simon Guinot (3): > > >> leds: netxbig: add device tree binding > > >> ARM: Kirkwood: add LED DT entries for netxbig boards > > >> ARM: mvebu: remove static LED setup for netxbig boards > > > > > > Hi Brian, > > > > > > Please, consider merging the first patch of this serie. > > > > Brian, > > > > here again let me know when this patch will be merged, and I will > > also need a stable tag as patch 2 depends on this one. > > > > Andrew, Jason, > > > > patch 2 and 3 looks OK for me. What is your opinion about it? > > Hi Gregory, Andrew and Jason, > > This patch set seems stuck. I believe that Bryan is probably too busy to > handle it... > > Is that possible to merge it via the mvebu tree ? Since only some LaCie > boards are impacted, I think it could make sense. Hi Simon Hard one. I also have a driver stuck in led limbo. Last time we took a fix via mvebu, it all went messy at the last minute. We made it very clear to Bryon we planned to take a patch via mvebu, we had queued it via mvebu, we had sent a pull request to arm-soc, all with no reply from Bryon. Only at the last minute did he jump in, pull it himself and send it to Linus. That caused Olof all sorts of problems with his tree. To stop that happening again, i think we need an Acked-by from Bryan. Andrew