From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: another pmem variant V2 Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 18:16:48 +0200 Message-ID: <20150331161648.GA1318@lst.de> References: <1427358764-6126-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <55143A8B.2060304@plexistor.com> <20150331092526.GA25958@lst.de> <551AB9C7.6020505@plexistor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com, axboe@kernel.dk To: Boaz Harrosh Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <551AB9C7.6020505@plexistor.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 06:14:15PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > We can not accept it as is right now. Who is we? > We have conducted farther tests. And it messes up NUMA. Only you if you use the memmap option in weird ways. Sounds like I should simply remove the memmap= option so people don't abuse it. The main point is to parse the e820 tables, which works fine. And those people having fake pmem, or pcie cards that they are too lazy to submit proper drivers for can stick to their out of tree hacks?