From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Amitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1606@gmail.com>
Cc: outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH v2] Staging: sm750fb: Fix C99 Comments
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 10:26:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150402082602.GA18362@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150401163406.GA3271@amitoj-Inspiron-3542>
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 10:04:06PM +0530, Amitoj Kaur Chawla wrote:
> Used C89 instead of C99 Comments and removed C99 comments performing prints only. Problem found using checkpatch.pl
> ERROR: do not use C99 // comments
>
> Signed-off-by: Amitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1606@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> -Wrap comment lines at 72 characters
You didn't do that, look above, your changelog is still not linewrapped
:(
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-02 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-01 16:34 [PATCH v2] Staging: sm750fb: Fix C99 Comments Amitoj Kaur Chawla
2015-04-02 8:26 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150402082602.GA18362@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=amitoj1606@gmail.com \
--cc=outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.