From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] SQUASHME: Fixes to e820 handling of pmem Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 11:40:22 +0200 Message-ID: <20150402094022.GA14584@lst.de> References: <1427872339-6688-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1427872339-6688-2-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <551BFFD2.20608@plexistor.com> <20150402093037.GA14209@lst.de> <20150402093740.GA3706@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Boaz Harrosh , linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com To: Ingo Molnar Return-path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:35030 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751255AbbDBJkX (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2015 05:40:23 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150402093740.GA3706@gmail.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 11:37:40AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > So assuming this works on your test setup I'm inclined to squash > Boaz's fixes into the original patch, assuming you see no outright bug > in them. Anything else can be done as delta improvements. It looks sensible, but I'd really like to understand the changes a bit better. In the meantime I'll test them on my setup.