From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Sat, 04 Apr 2015 23:57:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:33079 "EHLO linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S27006155AbbDDV477BzL0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Apr 2015 23:56:59 +0200 Received: from scotty.linux-mips.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.14.9/8.14.8) with ESMTP id t34Lv084016755; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 23:57:00 +0200 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t34Lv0lT016754; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 23:57:00 +0200 Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 23:57:00 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/48] FPU and FP emulation clean-ups, fixes and feature updates Message-ID: <20150404215700.GF20157@linux-mips.org> References: <20150404200459.GE20157@linux-mips.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 46781 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 09:55:09PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Is there a better branch than master of ralf/linux.git to base patches > submitted against so as to save you from the need to sort out conflicts? > Let me know if you need help with any unobvious 3-way merge too. That's a little harder this time. Normally the top of upstream-sfr's mips-for-linux-next is a good choice for the base but this time I have another branch, 4.1-fp in upstream-sfr and I want to keep the merge commit pulling this branch and the 4.0-fixes branch on top which lands me in a bunch of conflicts. The conflicts are in arch/mips/include/asm/asmmacro-32.h arch/mips/kernel/traps.c I've tested a number of defconfigs and I'm pushing a new upstream-sfr now. I'd appreciate if you could test/review the result. Ralf