From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/signal: Remove pax argument from restore_sigcontext
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 09:03:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150406070329.GA30088@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMzpN2gDPej+M=3D_m0-MmtyZ+VYpP=D3GxdP6aEpzH8JeWg9Q@mail.gmail.com>
* Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm wondering what the original reason for adding the extra
> > handling of regs->ax was. Maybe something changed regs->ax - but I
> > cannot find such code path anymore.
> >
> > It would be nice to try to do a bit of Git archeology to figure
> > out the origins of this complication - maybe it's something subtle
> > - or it's something that has changed meanwhile.
>
> It goes all the way back to 2.1.106pre1, when restore_sigcontext()
> was changed to return an error code instead of EAX directly.
>
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/history/history.git/diff/arch/i386/kernel/signal.c?id=9a8f8b7ca3f319bd668298d447bdf32730e51174
Indeed: restore_sigcontext() used to return eax as a return value,
without copying it into regs->ax.
Then in 2007 sigaltstack syscall support was added, where the return
value of restore_sigcontext() was changed to carry the memory-copying
failure code. But instead of putting 'ax' into regs->ax, it was
carried in via a pointer and then returned, where the generic syscall
return code copied it to regs->ax.
So there was never any deeper reason for this suboptimal pattern, it
was simply never noticed after being introduced.
(Btw., the regs->ax we return will be copied back to regs->ax after
the syscall straight away once again - but I guess this cannot be
helped.)
I've added this information to the changelog.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-06 7:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-04 12:58 [PATCH] x86/signal: Remove pax argument from restore_sigcontext Brian Gerst
2015-04-04 14:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-04 17:07 ` Brian Gerst
2015-04-05 5:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-05 0:01 ` Brian Gerst
2015-04-06 7:03 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-04-06 12:00 ` Brian Gerst
2015-04-07 9:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-07 9:40 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Brian Gerst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150406070329.GA30088@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.