From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 19/19] IB/mad: Implement Intel Omni-Path Architecture MAD processing Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 11:16:59 -0600 Message-ID: <20150407171659.GA15634@obsidianresearch.com> References: <1423092585-26692-1-git-send-email-ira.weiny@intel.com> <1423092585-26692-20-git-send-email-ira.weiny@intel.com> <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A82373A8FBD9DE@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> <20150407022954.GA7531@obsidianresearch.com> <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A82373A8FBE150@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A82373A8FBE150-P5GAC/sN6hkd3b2yrw5b5LfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "Hefty, Sean" Cc: "Weiny, Ira" , "roland-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "hal-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 04:57:43PM +0000, Hefty, Sean wrote: > > Hal asked for this, and I agree. It is just lazy not to check the > > underlying device type for this stuff - they are different number > > spaces, administered by different bodies with no apparent > > coordination. > > > > The IBA is pretty clear what should happen to process an unsupported class > > version and and adding OPA shouldn't suddenly make the IB side > > non-conformant, however aesthetically unpleasing the code may be. > > Are there checks to ensure that MADs not supported by RoCE aren't > processed on RoCE ports? RoCE isn't different, it uses the same numbering space and rules as IB. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html