From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:45:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:54235 "EHLO linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S27009668AbbDGWpBGMLRQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Apr 2015 00:45:01 +0200 Received: from scotty.linux-mips.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.14.9/8.14.8) with ESMTP id t37Mj2hD013063; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 00:45:02 +0200 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t37Mj1HN013062; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 00:45:01 +0200 Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 00:45:01 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 47/48] MIPS: Respect the ISA level in FCSR handling Message-ID: <20150407224501.GC27914@linux-mips.org> References: <20150407125434.GA27914@linux-mips.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 46826 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:13:38PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > > Index: linux/arch/mips/include/asm/fpu.h > > > =================================================================== > > > --- linux.orig/arch/mips/include/asm/fpu.h 2015-04-02 20:18:47.499480000 +0100 > > > +++ linux/arch/mips/include/asm/fpu.h 2015-04-02 20:27:59.745241000 +0100 > > > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ > > > #include > > > #include > > > > > > +#include > > > #include > > > #include > > > #include > > > > This is adding a 2nd inclusion of . Will fix that. > > Thanks! I resisted the temptation to include changes to sort inclusions > with this series or it would risk becoming an ever going effort. Though > it would have avoided an oversight like this. I found it only because once in a blue moon I run the various checkers that ship with the kernel. Turns out half of them don't work out of the box, at least not for my setup so there's yet more work to do. Ralf