From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: jiang.liu@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
marc.zyngier@arm.com, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:irq/core] genirq: MSI: Fix freeing of unallocated MSI
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 14:00:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150409120023.GA12468@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tip-fe0c52fc003bc046380e52fe6799c96d770770cc@git.kernel.org>
* tip-bot for Marc Zyngier <tipbot@zytor.com> wrote:
> Commit-ID: fe0c52fc003bc046380e52fe6799c96d770770cc
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/fe0c52fc003bc046380e52fe6799c96d770770cc
> Author: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> AuthorDate: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 19:10:19 +0000
> Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> CommitDate: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 23:28:28 +0200
>
> genirq: MSI: Fix freeing of unallocated MSI
>
> While debugging an unrelated issue with the GICv3 ITS driver, the
> following trace triggered:
>
> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:1121 irq_domain_free_irqs+0x160/0x17c()
> NULL pointer, cannot free irq
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W 3.19.0-rc6+ #3690
> Hardware name: FVP Base (DT)
> Call trace:
> [<ffffffc000089398>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x13c
> [<ffffffc0000894e4>] show_stack+0x10/0x1c
> [<ffffffc00066d134>] dump_stack+0x74/0x94
> [<ffffffc0000a92f8>] warn_slowpath_common+0x9c/0xd4
> [<ffffffc0000a938c>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x5c/0x80
> [<ffffffc0000ee04c>] irq_domain_free_irqs+0x15c/0x17c
> [<ffffffc0000ef918>] msi_domain_free_irqs+0x58/0x74
> [<ffffffc000386f58>] free_msi_irqs+0xb4/0x1c0
>
> // The msi_prepare callback fails here
>
> [<ffffffc0003872c0>] pci_enable_msix+0x25c/0x3d4
> [<ffffffc00038746c>] pci_enable_msix_range+0x34/0x80
> [<ffffffc0003924ac>] vp_try_to_find_vqs+0xec/0x528
> [<ffffffc000392954>] vp_find_vqs+0x6c/0xa8
> [<ffffffc0003ee2a8>] init_vq+0x120/0x248
> [<ffffffc0003eefb0>] virtblk_probe+0xb0/0x6bc
> [<ffffffc00038fc34>] virtio_dev_probe+0x17c/0x214
> [<ffffffc0003d4a04>] driver_probe_device+0x7c/0x23c
> [<ffffffc0003d4cb0>] __driver_attach+0x98/0xa0
> [<ffffffc0003d2c60>] bus_for_each_dev+0x60/0xb4
> [<ffffffc0003d455c>] driver_attach+0x1c/0x28
> [<ffffffc0003d41b0>] bus_add_driver+0x150/0x208
> [<ffffffc0003d54c0>] driver_register+0x64/0x130
> [<ffffffc00038f9e8>] register_virtio_driver+0x24/0x68
> [<ffffffc00091320c>] init+0x70/0xac
> [<ffffffc0000828f0>] do_one_initcall+0x94/0x1d0
> [<ffffffc0008e9b00>] kernel_init_freeable+0x144/0x1e4
> [<ffffffc00066a434>] kernel_init+0xc/0xd8
> ---[ end trace f9ee562a77cc7bae ]---
>
> The ITS msi_prepare callback having failed, we end-up trying to
> free MSIs that have never been allocated. Oddly enough, the kernel
> is pretty upset about it.
>
> It turns out that this behaviour was expected before the MSI domain
> was introduced (and dealt with in arch_teardown_msi_irqs).
>
> The obvious fix is to detect this early enough and bail out.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1422299419-6051-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> ---
> kernel/irq/msi.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/msi.c b/kernel/irq/msi.c
> index 3e18163..474de5c 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/msi.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/msi.c
> @@ -310,8 +310,15 @@ void msi_domain_free_irqs(struct irq_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
> struct msi_desc *desc;
>
> for_each_msi_entry(desc, dev) {
> - irq_domain_free_irqs(desc->irq, desc->nvec_used);
> - desc->irq = 0;
> + /*
> + * We might have failed to allocate an MSI early
nit:
s/an MSI/an MSI interrupt
> + * enough that there is no IRQ associated to this
nit:
s/to/with
> + * entry. If that's the case, don't do anything.
> + */
> + if (desc->irq) {
> + irq_domain_free_irqs(desc->irq, desc->nvec_used);
> + desc->irq = 0;
> + }
Hm, so this appears to be the first time that 'irq == 0' assumptions
are getting into the genirq core. Is NO_IRQ dead? I realize that the
MSI code uses '!irq' as a flag, but still, quite a few architectures
define NO_IRQ so it appears to matter to them.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-09 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-26 19:10 [PATCH] genirq: MSI: Fix freeing of unallocated MSI Marc Zyngier
2015-01-27 5:33 ` Jiang Liu
2015-04-08 21:30 ` [tip:irq/core] " tip-bot for Marc Zyngier
2015-04-09 12:00 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-04-09 12:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-04-09 12:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-04-09 14:49 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150409120023.GA12468@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.