From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chao Peng Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/12] x86: dynamically get/set CBM for a domain Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 15:37:46 +0800 Message-ID: <20150410073746.GE3417@pengc-linux.bj.intel.com> References: <1428571105-3604-1-git-send-email-chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> <1428571105-3604-9-git-send-email-chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> <5526F7F5.6030508@citrix.com> Reply-To: Chao Peng Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5526F7F5.6030508@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Andrew Cooper Cc: keir@xen.org, Ian.Campbell@citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, will.auld@intel.com, JBeulich@suse.com, wei.liu2@citrix.com, dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 11:06:45PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 09/04/2015 10:18, Chao Peng wrote: > > + find->cbm = cbm; > > + } > > + find->ref++; > > + map[old_cos].ref--; > > This can race with psr_free_cos() leading to corruption. It is possible > for two different domains to be holding their own spinlock but using the > same cos index. > > You definitely do need a psr/cos spinlock for safety. Indeed. Thanks. Chao