From: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>
To: Varka Bhadram <varkabhadram@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
Phoebe Buckheister <phoebe.buckheister@itwm.fraunhofer.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC bluetooth-next 0/4] ieee802154: add support for phy capabilities
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 10:35:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150410083500.GA709@omega> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55274B1A.2050900@gmail.com>
Hi Varka,
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 09:31:30AM +0530, Varka Bhadram wrote:
>
> I think better interface would be get_tx_power() for returning the current power setting
No, we have already such functionality to get the current tx power and
the 802.15.4 standard describes this as part of the pib. [0] 802.15.4
describes this as integer and I hope s8 is enough as range. But this is
funny then, because transceivers allow also floating point dbm values :-)
That 802.15.4 describes this as integer we should use a int (s8) as well here,
that was a open question in my other mails.
This pib attribute should be also set if set_tx_power was successful
afterwards with the values which was set.
> and tx_power_supported() to get the all the available power levels.
>
Yes we talking about the capabilities here only:
The general question about this capability is:
1. Does this interface will report all power levels for all page/channel?
or
2. Does this interface will report all power levels for current
page/channel setting only?
The second one is much easier to implement. But this is a question
which should be answered before.
If you asking yourself "which tx_powers for each ch/page?" This is not
available for 2.4 Ghz transceivers, but transceivers like the
at86rf212 which operates in 700/800/900Mhz have different tx power
settings according the channel/page setting.
The subquestion is here more how we should implement it. Current
solutions are:
1. Create a big array with some mask and set the bit about some
tx_power range and do some mask |= BIT(SUPP_5DBM). But this will
restrict the available setting of dbm levels.
2. The second idea was do use a "context based iteration of available
tx power settings". Netlink can do this quite well with nested
attributes. Calltrace would look like:
nla_nest_start
rdev_get_tx_pwr(&pwr)
rdev->ops->get_tx_pwr(&pwr)
mac802154_get_tx_pwr(&pwr)
/* driver_will_set_tx_pwr #1 */
nla_put_s8(pwr)
rdev_get_tx_pwr(&pwr)
rdev->ops->get_tx_pwr(&pwr)
mac802154_get_tx_pwr(&pwr)
/* driver_will_set_tx_pwr #2 */
nla_put_s8(pwr)
rdev_get_tx_pwr(&pwr)
rdev->ops->get_tx_pwr(&pwr)
mac802154_get_tx_pwr(&pwr)
/* driver_will_set_tx_pwr #3 */
nla_put_s8(pwr)
....
....
....
rdev_get_tx_pwr(&pwr)
rdev->ops->get_tx_pwr(&pwr)
mac802154_get_tx_pwr(&pwr)
/* driver_will_set_tx_pwr last. Must return 1 */
nla_put_s8(pwr)
/* indicated because rdev_get_tx_pwr returned 1 */
nla_nest_end
If you tell me you want "tx_power_supported()", please give me more
details how this interface will be look like.
- Alex
[0] http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/include/net/cfg802154.h#L78
[1] http://www.atmel.com/images/doc8168.pdf page 107
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-10 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-08 11:18 [RFC bluetooth-next 0/4] ieee802154: add support for phy capabilities Alexander Aring
2015-04-08 11:18 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 1/4] ieee802154: introduce wpan_phy_supported struct Alexander Aring
2015-04-09 6:17 ` Varka Bhadram
2015-04-08 11:18 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 2/4] ieee802154: move channels supported out of softmac Alexander Aring
2015-04-08 11:18 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 3/4] ieee802154: add several phy supported handling Alexander Aring
2015-04-08 14:16 ` Alexander Aring
[not found] ` <55261AB2.6050500@gmail.com>
2015-04-09 10:14 ` Alexander Aring
2015-04-08 11:18 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 4/4] at86rf230: set cca_modes supported flags Alexander Aring
2015-04-09 6:32 ` [RFC bluetooth-next 0/4] ieee802154: add support for phy capabilities Varka Bhadram
2015-04-09 9:28 ` Alexander Aring
2015-04-09 9:37 ` Varka Bhadram
2015-04-09 11:37 ` Alexander Aring
2015-04-09 12:33 ` Alexander Aring
2015-04-10 4:01 ` Varka Bhadram
2015-04-10 8:35 ` Alexander Aring [this message]
2015-04-11 12:04 ` Guido Günther
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150410083500.GA709@omega \
--to=alex.aring@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phoebe.buckheister@itwm.fraunhofer.de \
--cc=varkabhadram@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.