From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:33:53 +0100 Subject: [GIT PULL] ARM perf updates for 4.1 In-Reply-To: References: <20150327172246.GN1562@arm.com> <20150413091011.GA1582@arm.com> Message-ID: <20150413093353.GB1582@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:30:22AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 04:05:40PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > >> > Will Deacon (1): > >> > ARM: pmu: add support for interrupt-affinity property > >> > >> As most DTSes lack this property, we now get scary warnings: > >> > >> CPU PMU: Failed to parse /interrupt-affinity[0] > > > > That's a harmless warning (i.e. perf will `work' as before), but I'd like to > > print something to say that we didn't find the property. > > > >> BTW, shouldn't the DT update go in first, or together with the code update? > > > > It's going via the arm64 tree (I had to choose one of the trees for the > > binding, since they both arm and arm64 use it). > > OK. Will start to pull arm64 too into renesas-drivers... > > BTW, time to start unifying arm32 and arm64? ;-) We're already working on unifying the perf bits (the major duplication imo) by moving the bulk of it into drivers. Stay tuned! Will