From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: ASoC: davinci-mcasp: Set rule constraints if implicit BCLK divider is used Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:16:40 +0300 Message-ID: <20150413121639.GU16501@mwanda> References: <20150410093336.GA5779@mwanda> <552BAADA.5060401@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21979261A0A for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:16:49 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <552BAADA.5060401@ti.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Jyri Sarha Cc: "Ujfalusi, Peter" , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Mark Brown List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Thanks for looking at this. I haven't double checked your analysis, but 512 means the stack is 2k and that's too high. I think there is supposed to be a build warning if we use more than 1k of stack in a function? It's better to allocate it with kmalloc() and free it at the end. regards, dan carpenter