From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ACPI / scan: Simplify acpi_match_device()
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:37:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150414103729.GE1677@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1668402.ZSbgXyXmVa@vostro.rjw.lan>
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 09:59:48PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, April 13, 2015 10:21:59 PM Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > Hello Rafael J. Wysocki,
> >
> > The patch e1acdeb0e770: "ACPI / scan: Simplify acpi_match_device()"
> > from Apr 10, 2015, leads to the following static checker warning:
> >
> > drivers/acpi/scan.c:269 acpi_companion_match()
> > error: potential NULL dereference 'adev'.
> >
> > drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > 247 static struct acpi_device *acpi_companion_match(const struct device *dev)
> > 248 {
> > 249 struct acpi_device *adev;
> > 250
> > 251 adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
> > 252 if (!adev)
> > 253 return NULL;
> > 254
> > 255 if (list_empty(&adev->pnp.ids))
> > 256 return NULL;
> > 257
> > 258 mutex_lock(&adev->physical_node_lock);
> > 259 if (list_empty(&adev->physical_node_list)) {
> > 260 adev = NULL;
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^
> > 261 } else {
> > 262 const struct acpi_device_physical_node *node;
> > 263
> > 264 node = list_first_entry(&adev->physical_node_list,
> > 265 struct acpi_device_physical_node, node);
> > 266 if (node->dev != dev)
> > 267 adev = NULL;
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > 268 }
> > 269 mutex_unlock(&adev->physical_node_lock);
> > ^^^^^^
> > Dereference.
> >
> > 270
> > 271 return adev;
> > 272 }
>
> Right, thanks.
>
> The patch below should fix it.
>
> ---
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Subject: ACPI / scan: Fix NULL pointer dereference in acpi_companion_match()
>
> Commit e1acdeb0e770 "ACPI / scan: Simplify acpi_match_device()"
> introduced code that may lead to a NULL pointer dereference when
> trying to unlock a mutex. Fix that.
>
> Fixes: e1acdeb0e770 "ACPI / scan: Simplify acpi_match_device()"
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-14 10:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-13 19:21 ACPI / scan: Simplify acpi_match_device() Dan Carpenter
2015-04-13 19:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-04-14 10:37 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150414103729.GE1677@lahna.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.