From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754088AbbDTUP5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:15:57 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40833 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753604AbbDTUPy (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:15:54 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 22:15:39 +0200 From: Jiri Olsa To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Ingo Molnar , Jiri Olsa , lkml , Peter Zijlstra , Paul Mackerras , David Ahern , Namhyung Kim Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] perf tools: Report event parsing errors Message-ID: <20150420201539.GC10644@krava.redhat.com> References: <1429377946-2147-1-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org> <20150418173927.GA5897@gmail.com> <20150418204258.GA26943@krava.redhat.com> <20150420200936.GM11111@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150420200936.GM11111@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 05:09:36PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 10:42:58PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 07:39:27PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > So since we now know exactly what's going on, we might want to drop > > > the 'invalid or unsupported event' language as well, and make it > > > specific: > > > > > > $ ./perf record -e 'cpu/even=0x1/' ls > > > event syntax error: 'cpu/even=0x1/' > > > \___ unknown term > > > > > > > > > ? > > > > ok > > > > > > > > Also, for the above error, could we easily list the valid terms? An > > > error like: > > > > > > $ ./perf record -e 'cpu/even=0x1/' ls > > > event syntax error: 'cpu/even=0x1/' > > > \___ unknown term > > > valid terms: "event", "raw". > > > > > > or so? > > > > we already carry list of all terms for given pmu, > > so it shouldn't be a problem > > So, do you want me to apply this series and you work on top of it or > should I wait for another that implements what Ingo suggested? I'll resend v2 with the update > > Also, we have: > > [root@zoo ~]# perf stat --all -e cycles usleep 1 > > Performance counter stats for 'system wide': > > 3,382,595 cycles > > 0.001739102 seconds time elapsed > > [root@zoo ~]# perf stat --all-cpus -e cycles usleep 1 > > Performance counter stats for 'system wide': > > 2,435,672 cycles > > 0.001191689 seconds time elapsed > > [root@zoo ~]# perf stat --a -e cycles usleep 1 > Error: Ambiguous option: a (could be --no-no-aggr or --append) > > usage: perf stat [] [] > > [root@zoo ~]# > > Which is nice, wouldn't it be good to have it for the that as well, i.e. > for your example "ev=" would be a valid, and shorter form of "even=" or > "event=". hum, not sure I follow.. could you please explain in more details? jirka