Re: How do I resolve conflict after popping stash without adding the file to index?

[Jeff King <peff@peff.net>]

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 01:35:05AM +0300, Dmitry Gutov wrote:

> >But we seem to skip that safety valve when the content has been staged,
> >which seems questionable to me (technically we are slightly better off
> >than the protected case because "bbbbb" was written to a git blob
> >object, so you can recover it.  But it may be difficult to find the
> >correct blob in the object database).
> 
> Any suggestions how to restore that content in the index programmatically?
> If it's non-trivial to do, maybe that is indeed a bug, and 'git stash pop'
> should abort before creating the conflict.

Right, I am suggesting that latter: that stash should abort if the index
has modified entries. The abort for modified working tree files is done
by git-merge, which can be selective about which entries will be changed
(since it knows which ones need written).  I haven't thought hard enough
to say whether it should be doing the same for the index (i.e., whether
this is a "merge" problem or a "stash" problem).

-Peff