From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Bertrand Jacquin <beber@meleeweb.net>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Clark Williams <clark.williams@gmail.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] rcu: config: Remove prompt for RCU implementation
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 18:18:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150422011821.GR5561@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1429651783-7754-1-git-send-email-bobby.prani@gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 05:29:42PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> The RCU implementation which is chosen is dependent on PREEMPT and SMP config
> options and is not really a user-selectable choice. The following change will
> remove the menu entry and will be derived from the above two options.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
Hmmm... I guess that there isn't much point in calling something a
"choice" when it hasn't really been a choice for quite a few years
now. I queued this, and have started testing it.
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> init/Kconfig | 18 ++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> index 0b37750..7707e4a 100644
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -463,13 +463,9 @@ endmenu # "CPU/Task time and stats accounting"
>
> menu "RCU Subsystem"
>
> -choice
> - prompt "RCU Implementation"
> - default TREE_RCU
> -
> config TREE_RCU
> - bool "Tree-based hierarchical RCU"
> - depends on !PREEMPT && SMP
> + bool
> + default y if !PREEMPT && SMP
> help
> This option selects the RCU implementation that is
> designed for very large SMP system with hundreds or
> @@ -477,8 +473,8 @@ config TREE_RCU
> smaller systems.
>
> config PREEMPT_RCU
> - bool "Preemptible tree-based hierarchical RCU"
> - depends on PREEMPT
> + bool
> + default y if PREEMPT
> help
> This option selects the RCU implementation that is
> designed for very large SMP systems with hundreds or
> @@ -489,16 +485,14 @@ config PREEMPT_RCU
> Select this option if you are unsure.
>
> config TINY_RCU
> - bool "UP-only small-memory-footprint RCU"
> - depends on !PREEMPT && !SMP
> + bool
> + default y if !PREEMPT && !SMP
> help
> This option selects the RCU implementation that is
> designed for UP systems from which real-time response
> is not required. This option greatly reduces the
> memory footprint of RCU.
>
> -endchoice
> -
> config RCU_EXPERT
> bool "Make expert-level adjustments to RCU configuration"
> default n
> --
> 1.9.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-22 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-21 21:29 [RFC PATCH] rcu: config: Remove prompt for RCU implementation Pranith Kumar
2015-04-22 1:18 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150422011821.GR5561@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=beber@meleeweb.net \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=clark.williams@gmail.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mcgrof@suse.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.