From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id EA32CE009C6; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 13:15:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high * trust * [198.47.26.153 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from devils.ext.ti.com (devils.ext.ti.com [198.47.26.153]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C884E009BE for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 13:15:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dflxv15.itg.ti.com ([128.247.5.124]) by devils.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t3NKFEIH032126 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:15:14 -0500 Received: from DLEE70.ent.ti.com (dlee70.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.113]) by dflxv15.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t3NKFDEb010160 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:15:13 -0500 Received: from dlep32.itg.ti.com (157.170.170.100) by DLEE70.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:15:12 -0500 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dlep32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t3NKFClZ009997; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:15:12 -0500 Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:15:12 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Jacob Stiffler Message-ID: <20150423201511.GT25236@edge> References: <1429789331-18918-1-git-send-email-j-stiffler@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1429789331-18918-1-git-send-email-j-stiffler@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] Proposal for enabling CMEM X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 20:15:20 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 07:42:09AM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote: > This is a proposal for adding a CMEM region in the device tree. > > I wanted to get comments on the following: > > * implementation of using an inc file to enable this. > * Whether the actual configuration belongs in the kernel recipe, or if > this is something that should be handled at the distro or branding > level. (RFC sets the configuration in kernel recipe). > - I have verified that this configuration may also be set in the > branding file using, for example, > > CMEM_BASE_pn-linux-ti-staging_omap-a15 = "a0000000" > CMEM_SIZE_pn-linux-ti-staging_omap-a15 = "20000000" Hmm, on one hand I don't like this change being so invasive. But on the other hand, I'm not sure there's a better cleaner way to do a dts injection like that. Let me think about it... > Jacob Stiffler (2): > linux/cmem.inc: Support reserving memory for CMEM. > linux-ti-staging_3.14: Add CMEM region for omap-a15. > > recipes-kernel/linux/cmem.inc | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_3.14.bb | 6 +++++- > recipes-kernel/linux/linux/cmem.dtsi | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/cmem.inc > create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux/cmem.dtsi > > -- > 1.7.9.5 > > -- > _______________________________________________ > meta-ti mailing list > meta-ti@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti