From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.10]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F0E272277 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 02:48:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.nefkom.net (unknown [192.168.8.184]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3lbRzf3qYYz3hhsx; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 04:40:46 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: MzgCQzRKQyqGtcIMpI1SgyHfi/8LmAPIj0AcWx4h9TQ= Received: from chi.localnet (unknown [195.140.253.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-auth.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3lbRzf1M04zvhTZ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 04:40:46 +0200 (CEST) From: Marek Vasut To: Otavio Salvador Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 03:32:30 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.13-trunk-amd64; KDE/4.13.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <1413746147-7120-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201504280332.30589.marex@denx.de> Cc: Paul Eggleton , Koen Kooi , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Add basic fitImage support X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 02:48:07 -0000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sunday, October 19, 2014 at 09:32:11 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > This series cleans up the code in kernel.bbclass and > > separates out the uImage generation. The last patch > > in this series then adds support for generation of the > > advanced successor of the uImage, the fitImage. > > > > This series adds only very rudimentary support for > > generation of fitImage. The advanced features might > > be added in subsequent patches. > > > > I would also like to thank Richard for explaining to > > me how to properly do the implementation and I hope > > this series is at least close to that. > > I really liked the series and I will start testing it; the only remark > I had is the first patch which says it has no functional change but > uses a more permissive regexp. Fixed. Best regards, Marek Vasut