From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:36:15 +0100 Subject: [PATCH RESEND v6 4/6] regulator: axp20x: add support for AXP22X regulators In-Reply-To: <20150410154809.GN6023@sirena.org.uk> References: <1428638946-24890-1-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> <1428638946-24890-5-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> <20150410154809.GN6023@sirena.org.uk> Message-ID: <20150429123615.GM9169@x1> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, 10 Apr 2015, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:09:04PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > > This patch depends on the previous patch "regulator: axp20x: prepare > > support for multiple AXP chip families" and the mfd header from the > > first patch "mfd: axp20x: add AXP22x PMIC support". > > > Could we merge both regulator patches through the mfd tree, with the > > other patches in the series? There are no other external dependencies. > > Yes, of course we can - that's the whole point of me sending a > Reviewed-by! Half of what I'm trying to do with that is to cut down on > the number of reposts of MFD series I get sent :( Okay, I'm ready to take this now. Mark, Do you want a pull-request, or are you happy for me to just apply? -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v6 4/6] regulator: axp20x: add support for AXP22X regulators Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:36:15 +0100 Message-ID: <20150429123615.GM9169@x1> References: <1428638946-24890-1-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> <1428638946-24890-5-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> <20150410154809.GN6023@sirena.org.uk> Reply-To: lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150410154809.GN6023-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: Mark Brown Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai , Samuel Ortiz , Liam Girdwood , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Boris BREZILLON , Maxime Ripard , Carlo Caione , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 10 Apr 2015, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:09:04PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >=20 > > This patch depends on the previous patch "regulator: axp20x: prepare > > support for multiple AXP chip families" and the mfd header from the > > first patch "mfd: axp20x: add AXP22x PMIC support". >=20 > > Could we merge both regulator patches through the mfd tree, with the > > other patches in the series? There are no other external dependencies. >=20 > Yes, of course we can - that's the whole point of me sending a > Reviewed-by! Half of what I'm trying to do with that is to cut down on > the number of reposts of MFD series I get sent :( Okay, I'm ready to take this now. Mark, Do you want a pull-request, or are you happy for me to just apply? --=20 Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to linux-sunxi+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423211AbbD2MgY (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2015 08:36:24 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com ([209.85.212.174]:34862 "EHLO mail-wi0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423004AbbD2MgV (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2015 08:36:21 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:36:15 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Mark Brown Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai , Samuel Ortiz , Liam Girdwood , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Boris BREZILLON , Maxime Ripard , Carlo Caione , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v6 4/6] regulator: axp20x: add support for AXP22X regulators Message-ID: <20150429123615.GM9169@x1> References: <1428638946-24890-1-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> <1428638946-24890-5-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> <20150410154809.GN6023@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20150410154809.GN6023@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 10 Apr 2015, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:09:04PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > > This patch depends on the previous patch "regulator: axp20x: prepare > > support for multiple AXP chip families" and the mfd header from the > > first patch "mfd: axp20x: add AXP22x PMIC support". > > > Could we merge both regulator patches through the mfd tree, with the > > other patches in the series? There are no other external dependencies. > > Yes, of course we can - that's the whole point of me sending a > Reviewed-by! Half of what I'm trying to do with that is to cut down on > the number of reposts of MFD series I get sent :( Okay, I'm ready to take this now. Mark, Do you want a pull-request, or are you happy for me to just apply? -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog