From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Rafa?? Mi??ecki <zajec5@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
"grmoore@altera.com" <grmoore@altera.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>,
Alison Chaiken <alison_chaiken@mentor.com>,
"Bean Huo \(beanhuo\)" <beanhuo@micron.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] MTD: spi-nor: add flag to not use sector erase.
Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 16:20:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201505011620.05512.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOMqctSn-Ct06tWqSVYPbdoXcFmwrLb1Y9MGvhsSz0gf+fRP3Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Friday, May 01, 2015 at 09:05:15 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> On 1 May 2015 at 01:13, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> > On Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 11:13:12 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> >> The sector size of the flash memory is unclear from datasheet or may
> >> possibly vary between chips so add a flag to always use 4k blocks.
> >>
> >> Currently 4k blocks are always used when possible but in the future
> >> somebody might want to do some optimizations with sector erase.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com>
> >
> > I _think_ you might be able to determine the size, no ?
> >
> > One way is to ask the vendor, but you can also try something like:
> > 1) erase the whole SPI NOR
> > 2) overwrite it with zeroes (or ones ? I think it should be all ones
> > after erasing).
> > 3) Erase sector 0
> > 4) Read some 128 KiB back
> > 5) Observe what is the difference.
>
> I can determine it for this particular chip. However, when the vendor
> datasheet says the block is 64/32K it might mean that chips with this
> ID can have either block size.
http://www.chingistek.com/img/Product_Files/Pm25LD010020datasheet%20v04.pdf
page 21:
SECTOR_ER (20h) erases 4kByte sector.
BLOCK_ER (d8h) erases 64kByte sector.
http://www.gigadevice.com/product/download/366.html?locale=en_US
page 27-28:
Sector Erase (SE) (20h) erases 4kByte sector
64KB Block Erase (BE) (d8h) erases 64kByte sector
> It's a value that we don't use anyway so I just mark it as unknown
> here for future reference.
Looks like standard SPI NOR opcodes [1], nothing unknown there ;-)
[1] include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
"Rafa?? Mi??ecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>,
Alison Chaiken <alison_chaiken@mentor.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
"Bean Huo (beanhuo)" <beanhuo@micron.com>,
"grmoore@altera.com" <grmoore@altera.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] MTD: spi-nor: add flag to not use sector erase.
Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 16:20:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201505011620.05512.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOMqctSn-Ct06tWqSVYPbdoXcFmwrLb1Y9MGvhsSz0gf+fRP3Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Friday, May 01, 2015 at 09:05:15 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> On 1 May 2015 at 01:13, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> > On Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 11:13:12 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> >> The sector size of the flash memory is unclear from datasheet or may
> >> possibly vary between chips so add a flag to always use 4k blocks.
> >>
> >> Currently 4k blocks are always used when possible but in the future
> >> somebody might want to do some optimizations with sector erase.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com>
> >
> > I _think_ you might be able to determine the size, no ?
> >
> > One way is to ask the vendor, but you can also try something like:
> > 1) erase the whole SPI NOR
> > 2) overwrite it with zeroes (or ones ? I think it should be all ones
> > after erasing).
> > 3) Erase sector 0
> > 4) Read some 128 KiB back
> > 5) Observe what is the difference.
>
> I can determine it for this particular chip. However, when the vendor
> datasheet says the block is 64/32K it might mean that chips with this
> ID can have either block size.
http://www.chingistek.com/img/Product_Files/Pm25LD010020datasheet%20v04.pdf
page 21:
SECTOR_ER (20h) erases 4kByte sector.
BLOCK_ER (d8h) erases 64kByte sector.
http://www.gigadevice.com/product/download/366.html?locale=en_US
page 27-28:
Sector Erase (SE) (20h) erases 4kByte sector
64KB Block Erase (BE) (d8h) erases 64kByte sector
> It's a value that we don't use anyway so I just mark it as unknown
> here for future reference.
Looks like standard SPI NOR opcodes [1], nothing unknown there ;-)
[1] include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-01 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-30 21:42 [PATCH 0/3] Minor fix and new Chip IDs for spi-nor Michal Suchanek
2015-04-30 13:33 ` [PATCH 1/3] MTD: m25p80: fix write return value Michal Suchanek
2015-04-30 23:09 ` Marek Vasut
2015-04-30 23:09 ` Marek Vasut
2015-05-20 23:45 ` Brian Norris
2015-05-20 23:45 ` Brian Norris
2015-05-21 8:33 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-05-21 8:33 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-04-30 19:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] MTD: spi-nor: Add Pm25LD020 and GD25Q41B chip ID Michal Suchanek
2015-04-30 21:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] MTD: spi-nor: add flag to not use sector erase Michal Suchanek
2015-04-30 23:13 ` Marek Vasut
2015-04-30 23:13 ` Marek Vasut
2015-05-01 7:05 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-05-01 7:05 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-05-01 10:50 ` Jonas Gorski
2015-05-01 10:50 ` Jonas Gorski
2015-05-01 14:20 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2015-05-01 14:20 ` Marek Vasut
2015-05-04 11:11 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-05-04 11:11 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-05-04 12:12 ` Marek Vasut
2015-05-04 12:12 ` Marek Vasut
2015-05-04 13:18 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-05-04 13:18 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-05-04 13:35 ` Marek Vasut
2015-05-04 13:35 ` Marek Vasut
2015-05-04 13:39 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-05-04 13:39 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-05-04 14:11 ` Marek Vasut
2015-05-04 14:11 ` Marek Vasut
2015-05-01 21:56 ` Rafał Miłecki
2015-05-01 21:56 ` Rafał Miłecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201505011620.05512.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=alison_chaiken@mentor.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=grmoore@altera.com \
--cc=hramrach@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.