diff for duplicates of <20150501200221.GF14154@mwanda> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 124897b..b5310bf 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ void *obd_zalloc(size_t size) Except, huh? Shouldn't we be using GFP_NOFS for the vzalloc() side? There was some discussion of that GFP_NOFS was a bit buggy back in 2010 -(http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m\x128942194520631&w=4) but the current +(http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=128942194520631&w=4) but the current lustre code doesn't try to pass GFP_NOFS. Then it's simple enough to change OBD_FREE_LARGE() to kvfree(). diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 0ce5a2b..fa76f5c 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ "ref\0a650e757977e491b816c34e7780c1a08@EXCHCS32.ornl.gov\0" "From\0Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>\0" "Subject\0Re: [HPDD-discuss] [PATCH 2/11] Staging: lustre: fld: Use kzalloc and kfree\0" - "Date\0Fri, 01 May 2015 20:02:21 +0000\0" + "Date\0Fri, 1 May 2015 23:02:21 +0300\0" "To\0Simmons" " James A. <simmonsja@ornl.gov>\0" "Cc\0'Julia Lawall' <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>" @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ "\n" "Except, huh? Shouldn't we be using GFP_NOFS for the vzalloc() side?\n" "There was some discussion of that GFP_NOFS was a bit buggy back in 2010\n" - "(http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m\0228942194520631&w=4) but the current\n" + "(http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=128942194520631&w=4) but the current\n" "lustre code doesn't try to pass GFP_NOFS.\n" "\n" "Then it's simple enough to change OBD_FREE_LARGE() to kvfree().\n" @@ -41,4 +41,4 @@ "regards,\n" dan carpenter -78893c8cfdeda4350f106f32add09c8f8762ce6177bc2da33960d9020fa4e4d5 +e43f3a118d712f0c8e1b22c88f5ab1a78ee2b78e8b0c67277fb266d535d8eaa2
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.