All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2,2/2] powerpc32: add support for csum_add()
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 17:10:55 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150504221055.GA17056@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430528414.16357.201.camel@freescale.com>

On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 08:00:14PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 21:01 +0200, christophe leroy wrote:
> > The generated code is most likely different on ppc64. I have no ppc64
> > compiler

For reference: yes you do.  Just add -m64.

> Ideal (short of a 64-bit __wsum) would probably be something like (untested):
> 
> 	add	r3,r3,r4
> 	srdi	r5,r3,32
> 	add	r3,r3,r5
> 	clrldi	r3,r3,32
> 
> Or in C code (which would let the compiler schedule it better):
> 
> static inline __wsum csum_add(__wsum csum, __wsum addend)
> {
>         u64 res = (__force u64)csum;
>         res += (__force u32)addend;
>         return (__force __wsum)((u32)res + (res >> 32));
> }

Older GCC make exactly your asm code for that, in 64-bit; newer GCC get
two adds (one as 32-bit, one as 64-bit, it does not see those are the
same, grrr); and GCC 5 makes the perfect  addc 3,4,3 ; addze 3,3  for
this in 32-bit mode.  You don't want to see what older GCC does with
32-bit though :-/


Segher

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: christophe leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2,2/2] powerpc32: add support for csum_add()
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 17:10:55 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150504221055.GA17056@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430528414.16357.201.camel@freescale.com>

On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 08:00:14PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 21:01 +0200, christophe leroy wrote:
> > The generated code is most likely different on ppc64. I have no ppc64
> > compiler

For reference: yes you do.  Just add -m64.

> Ideal (short of a 64-bit __wsum) would probably be something like (untested):
> 
> 	add	r3,r3,r4
> 	srdi	r5,r3,32
> 	add	r3,r3,r5
> 	clrldi	r3,r3,32
> 
> Or in C code (which would let the compiler schedule it better):
> 
> static inline __wsum csum_add(__wsum csum, __wsum addend)
> {
>         u64 res = (__force u64)csum;
>         res += (__force u32)addend;
>         return (__force __wsum)((u32)res + (res >> 32));
> }

Older GCC make exactly your asm code for that, in 64-bit; newer GCC get
two adds (one as 32-bit, one as 64-bit, it does not see those are the
same, grrr); and GCC 5 makes the perfect  addc 3,4,3 ; addze 3,3  for
this in 32-bit mode.  You don't want to see what older GCC does with
32-bit though :-/


Segher

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-04 22:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-03 11:39 [PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc32: add support for csum_add() Christophe Leroy
2015-02-03 11:39 ` Christophe Leroy
2015-03-25  1:30 ` [v2,2/2] " Scott Wood
2015-03-25  1:30   ` Scott Wood
2015-04-28 19:01   ` christophe leroy
2015-05-02  1:00     ` Scott Wood
2015-05-02  1:00       ` Scott Wood
2015-05-04 22:10       ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2015-05-04 22:10         ` Segher Boessenkool
2015-05-19 11:37         ` leroy christophe
2015-05-19 11:37           ` leroy christophe
2015-03-31  3:14 ` Scott Wood
2015-03-31  3:14   ` Scott Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150504221055.GA17056@gate.crashing.org \
    --to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.