From: Ingo Molnar <mingo2.kernel.org@gmail.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] signals: Generate warning when flush_signals() is called from non-kthread context
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 12:19:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150506101927.GA17291@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150503173401.GA22052@redhat.com>
* Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> > --- a/kernel/signal.c
> > +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> > @@ -427,6 +427,10 @@ void flush_signals(struct task_struct *t)
> > {
> > unsigned long flags;
> >
> > + /* Only kthreads are allowed to destroy signals: */
> > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!(current->flags & PF_KTHREAD)))
> > + return;
> > +
>
> But I am not sure this can't make some buggy driver even more buggy.
> Just suppose it does something
>
> do {
> if (signal_pending())
> flush_signals();
> } while (wait_event_interruptible(...));
>
> and this change will turn this into busy-wait loop.
>
> So perhaps another change which just adds WARN_ON_RATELIMIT()
> without "return" will be safer?
Yeah, absolutely.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-06 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-01 17:40 [GIT PULL] VFIO fixes for v4.1-rc2 Alex Williamson
2015-05-01 18:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-05-01 18:48 ` Alex Williamson
2015-05-01 20:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-05-01 22:03 ` Alex Williamson
2015-05-01 19:38 ` [PATCH] signals: Generate warning when flush_signals() is called from non-kthread context Ingo Molnar
2015-05-02 8:30 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-02 16:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-05-07 12:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-04 17:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-07 13:33 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-05-07 22:37 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-02 11:56 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2015-05-02 16:33 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-05-03 17:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-04 16:45 ` [PATCH 0/1] signals: don't abuse __flush_signals() in selinux_bprm_committed_creds() Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-04 16:45 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-04 19:43 ` Paul Moore
2015-05-04 19:43 ` Paul Moore
2015-05-06 10:19 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-05-01 20:11 ` [GIT PULL] VFIO fixes for v4.1-rc2 Richard Weinberger
2015-05-01 21:09 ` Richard Weinberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150506101927.GA17291@gmail.com \
--to=mingo2.kernel.org@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=zbr@ioremap.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.