From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: stable release cadence Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 16:48:56 -0400 Message-ID: <20150506204856.GA8913@l.oracle.com> References: <5549017E0200007800076CEB@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Yq6Fa-0002r7-9L for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 06 May 2015 20:49:02 +0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5549017E0200007800076CEB@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 04:44:30PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > All, > > on the hackathon we discussed this topic. With the rate of changes > going into the stable trees not being as high anymore as a few > years ago, we settled on trying to stick to a 4 month release > cycle going forward. Of course, issues like the currently severely > lagging osstest can always lead to delays, and we're not intending > to release not properly tested code just because the schedule > says so. But the intention is to at least initiate the process of > preparing stable releases mainly based on time, i.e. in particular > not taking into account the (possibly small) set of accumulated > changes. > > If anyone is heavily objecting to this, or foresees other kinds of > problems with this scheme - please speak up soon! Just +1 on this. Thank you! > > Regards, Jan > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel