From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] xenalyze: remove traling whitespaces
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 08:22:08 +0200
Message-ID: <20150508062208.GC1737@aepfle.de>
References: <1430994944-20471-1-git-send-email-olaf@aepfle.de>
	<1430994944-20471-8-git-send-email-olaf@aepfle.de>
	<554BA059.2020708@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <554BA059.2020708@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Thu, May 07, Andrew Cooper wrote:

> On 07/05/15 11:35, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > Result of "sed -i 's@[[:blank:]]\+$@@' tools/xentrace/xenalyze/xenalyze.c"
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
> > Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
> > Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> > Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> > Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
> 
> Why not refresh patch 1 using git's --whitespace=fix mode?  It would
> save adding whitespace just to remove it again, and also fix up the
> other imported files.

As George said, my intention was to use the sources from hg as is.

My editor marks trailing spaces. But I have another changeset, the
result from running indent(1) on the source. It would have the same
effect.  Too bad, the result cant be used as is so I have excluded it
from this series. The manual editing of the result takes some time.

Olaf