From: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>
To: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] MIPS: KVM: role back pc in case of EMULATE_FAIL
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 17:39:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150508153943.GE20045@opentech.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <554CCB3B.90504@imgtec.com>
On Fri, 08 May 2015, James Hogan wrote:
> On 07/05/15 13:51, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> > Currently if kvm_mips_complete_mmio_load() fails with EMULATE_FAIL it will
> > not role back the pc nor will the caller handle this failure.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>
> > ---
> > arch/mips/kvm/emulate.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > kvm_mips_complete_mmio_load is called only in arch/mips/kvm/mips.c without
> > checking the return value to signal EMULATE_FAIL:
> > 383 if (vcpu->mmio_needed) {
> > 384 if (!vcpu->mmio_is_write)
> > 385 kvm_mips_complete_mmio_load(vcpu, run);
> > 386 vcpu->mmio_needed = 0;
> > 387 }
> >
> > so maybe kvm_mips_complete_mmio_load should role back in case of failure
> > at arch/mips/kvm/emuilate.c:kvm_mips_complete_mmio_load()
> > 2406 if (er == EMULATE_FAIL) {
> > 2408 return er;
> >
> > something like the below patch - only based no looking at how EMULATE_FAIL
> > is handled at other locations - not sure if this is appropriate here.
> >
> > Patch was only compile tested msp71xx_defconfig + CONFIG_KVM=m
> >
> > Patch is against 4.1-rc2 (localversion-next is -next-20150506)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/mips/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/mips/kvm/emulate.c
> > index 2f0fc60..b58596b 100644
> > --- a/arch/mips/kvm/emulate.c
> > +++ b/arch/mips/kvm/emulate.c
> > @@ -2403,8 +2403,10 @@ enum emulation_result kvm_mips_complete_mmio_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > */
> > curr_pc = vcpu->arch.pc;
> > er = update_pc(vcpu, vcpu->arch.pending_load_cause);
> > - if (er == EMULATE_FAIL)
> > + if (er == EMULATE_FAIL) {
> > + vcpu->arch.pc = curr_pc;
>
> If update_pc returns EMULATE_FAIL then vcpu->arch.pc won't have been
> modified, so putting it back to the old value is redundant.
>
> Actually, curr_pc can be dropped from this function since nothing else
> can go wrong that would cause the PC to need rolling back. Effectively
> kvm_mips_emulate_load() has omitted to update the PC since it'll only
> return to userland to handle the MMIO and get the load data, so by the
> time it gets back to kvm_mips_complete_mmio_load(), it already has
> everything it needs to guarantee success.
>
ok - got it - the comment then was really missleading as it suggested that
a roleback was actually needed - so in that case the curr_pc; is really an
unused variable and can be tossed out - patch in a minute.
thx!
hofrat
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-08 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-07 12:51 [PATCH RFC] MIPS: KVM: role back pc in case of EMULATE_FAIL Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-05-08 14:42 ` James Hogan
2015-05-08 14:42 ` James Hogan
2015-05-08 15:39 ` Nicholas Mc Guire [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150508153943.GE20045@opentech.at \
--to=der.herr@hofr.at \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=hofrat@osadl.org \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.