From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com (bear.ext.ti.com [192.94.94.41]) by arago-project.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED03852093 for ; Fri, 8 May 2015 21:56:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dflxv15.itg.ti.com ([128.247.5.124]) by bear.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t48LuAWp025146 for ; Fri, 8 May 2015 16:56:10 -0500 Received: from DFLE73.ent.ti.com (dfle73.ent.ti.com [128.247.5.110]) by dflxv15.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t48LuAfs002069 for ; Fri, 8 May 2015 16:56:10 -0500 Received: from dlep32.itg.ti.com (157.170.170.100) by DFLE73.ent.ti.com (128.247.5.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Fri, 8 May 2015 16:56:09 -0500 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dlep32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t48Lu9aJ026814 for ; Fri, 8 May 2015 16:56:10 -0500 Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 17:56:09 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Message-ID: <20150508215609.GQ8462@edge> References: <20150430200816.GT29290@edge> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150430200816.GT29290@edge> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: RFC: turning off cortex optimizations for nightlies? X-BeenThere: meta-arago@arago-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Arago metadata layer for TI SDKs - OE-Core/Yocto compatible List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 21:56:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline Any comments or objections? On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 04:08:17PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > All, > > I'm considering turning off cortex optimizations for nightly CoreSDK builds. > Currently I'm building 8 machines and besides some machine-specific packages, > most of the packages get duplicated into cortex-a8, cortex-a9 and cortex-a15 > arch-specific directories - each is about 1.5 GB. > > Disabling cortex optimization will of course drop performance slightly (few > percent, if I remember correctly), but besides size savings, it also saves on > time for rebuilding those packages 3 times. All of them will be designated as > armv7a and built once. > > Any concerns, comments? > > -- > Denys > _______________________________________________ > meta-arago mailing list > meta-arago@arago-project.org > http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago