From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
"git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] lock_packed_refs(): allow retries when acquiring the packed-refs lock
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 12:49:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150511164941.GA30541@peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <555083CF.8010205@alum.mit.edu>
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:26:23PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> > So something like 100ms max backoff makes sense to me, in that it keeps
> > us in the same order of magnitude as the expected time that the lock is
> > held. [...]
>
> I don't understand your argument. If another process blocks us for on
> the order of 100 ms, the backoff time (reading from my table) is less
> than half of that.
I think it is just that I was agreeing with you, but communicated it
badly. I think your series is fine as-is.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-11 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-01 14:52 [PATCH 0/2] Retry attempts to acquire the packed-refs lock Michael Haggerty
2015-05-01 14:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] lockfile: allow file locking to be retried with a timeout Michael Haggerty
2015-05-11 18:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-05-01 14:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] lock_packed_refs(): allow retries when acquiring the packed-refs lock Michael Haggerty
2015-05-01 16:13 ` Johannes Sixt
2015-05-02 3:47 ` Michael Haggerty
2015-05-02 21:43 ` Johannes Sixt
2015-05-11 9:31 ` Michael Haggerty
2015-05-01 17:51 ` Stefan Beller
2015-05-01 18:22 ` Jeff King
2015-05-02 5:19 ` Michael Haggerty
2015-05-04 17:31 ` Stefan Beller
2015-05-05 19:21 ` Jeff King
2015-05-11 10:26 ` Michael Haggerty
2015-05-11 16:49 ` Jeff King [this message]
2015-05-11 17:49 ` Stefan Beller
2015-05-11 17:50 ` Stefan Beller
2015-05-03 2:12 ` [PATCH 0/2] Retry attempts to acquire " Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150511164941.GA30541@peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=sbeller@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.