From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
dvhart@linux.intel.com, oleg@redhat.com, bobby.prani@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/24] rcu: Directly drive RCU_USER_QS from Kconfig
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 02:37:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150513003750.GA1806@lerouge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431469854-3826-15-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 03:30:45PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Currently, Kconfig will ask the user whether RCU_USER_QS should be set.
> This is silly because Kconfig already has all the information that it
> needs to set this parameter. This commit therefore directly drives
> the value of RCU_USER_QS via NO_HZ_FULL's "select" statement.
>
> Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
ACK. And we should remove it completely and use NO_HZ_FULL instead.
There won't seem to be more users.
> Reviewed-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
> ---
> init/Kconfig | 10 +---------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> index 73db30a76afa..927210810189 100644
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -529,9 +529,7 @@ config CONTEXT_TRACKING
> bool
>
> config RCU_USER_QS
> - bool "Consider userspace as in RCU extended quiescent state"
> - depends on HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING && SMP
> - select CONTEXT_TRACKING
> + bool
> help
> This option sets hooks on kernel / userspace boundaries and
> puts RCU in extended quiescent state when the CPU runs in
> @@ -539,12 +537,6 @@ config RCU_USER_QS
> excluded from the global RCU state machine and thus doesn't
> try to keep the timer tick on for RCU.
>
> - Unless you want to hack and help the development of the full
> - dynticks mode, you shouldn't enable this option. It also
> - adds unnecessary overhead.
> -
> - If unsure say N
> -
> config CONTEXT_TRACKING_FORCE
> bool "Force context tracking"
> depends on CONTEXT_TRACKING
> --
> 1.8.1.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-13 0:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-12 22:30 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/24] Initialization/Kconfig updates for 4.2 Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/24] rcu: Control grace-period delays directly from value Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/24] rcu: Modulate grace-period slow init to normalize delay Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/24] rcu: Shut up spurious gcc uninitialized-variable warning Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/24] rcu: Panic if RCU tree can not accommodate all CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/24] rcu: Remove superfluous local variable in rcu_init_geometry() Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/24] rcu: Cleanup rcu_init_geometry() code and arithmetics Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-13 3:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-05-13 13:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-14 21:15 ` Alexander Gordeev
2015-05-12 22:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/24] rcu: Simplify rcu_init_geometry() capacity arithmetics Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/24] rcu: Limit rcu_state::levelcnt[] to RCU_NUM_LVLS items Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/24] rcu: Limit rcu_capacity[] size " Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/24] rcu: Remove unnecessary fields from rcu_state structure Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/24] rcu: Limit count of static data to the number of RCU levels Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/24] rcu: Simplify arithmetic to calculate number of RCU nodes Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/24] rcu: Provide diagnostic option to slow down grace-period scans Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/24] rcu: Directly drive TASKS_RCU from Kconfig Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-13 13:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-05-13 17:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/24] rcu: Directly drive RCU_USER_QS " Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-13 0:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2015-05-13 17:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-14 0:27 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-05-14 21:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 16/24] rcu: Convert CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_EXACT to boot parameter Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/24] rcu: Enable diagnostic dump of rcu_node combining tree Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 18/24] rcu: Create RCU_EXPERT Kconfig and hide booleans behind it Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 19/24] rcu: Break dependency of RCU_FANOUT_LEAF on RCU_FANOUT Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 20/24] rcu: Make RCU able to tolerate undefined CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 21/24] rcu: Make RCU able to tolerate undefined CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 22/24] rcu: Make RCU able to tolerate undefined CONFIG_RCU_KTHREAD_PRIO Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 23/24] rcu: Remove prompt for RCU implementation Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 24/24] rcu: Conditionally compile RCU's eqs warnings Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-13 13:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-05-13 15:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-29 9:39 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-29 20:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-29 20:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30 16:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-13 2:59 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/24] rcu: Control grace-period delays directly from value Steven Rostedt
2015-05-13 17:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150513003750.GA1806@lerouge \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.