From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: boot: dts: add DTS for Baltos IR5221 Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 08:50:12 -0700 Message-ID: <20150513155012.GI15563@atomide.com> References: <1431468917-27697-1-git-send-email-balbi@ti.com> <20150513074002.0b7b8dda@ipc1.ka-ro> <20150513152904.GC4201@saruman.tx.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:50745 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964997AbbEMPuQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2015 11:50:16 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150513152904.GC4201@saruman.tx.rr.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Felipe Balbi Cc: Lothar =?utf-8?Q?Wa=C3=9Fmann?= , Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linux ARM Kernel Mailing List , Yegor Yefremov * Felipe Balbi [150513 08:32]: > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 07:40:02AM +0200, Lothar Wa=C3=9Fmann wrote: > > > > > Should these be ordered alphabetically? >=20 > why ? In general the alphabetical ordering helps to avoid merge conflicts when new things are added later on as they are not all added to the end. So yeah I have a slight sorting preference there too to make my life easier in the future :) Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 08:50:12 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] arm: boot: dts: add DTS for Baltos IR5221 In-Reply-To: <20150513152904.GC4201@saruman.tx.rr.com> References: <1431468917-27697-1-git-send-email-balbi@ti.com> <20150513074002.0b7b8dda@ipc1.ka-ro> <20150513152904.GC4201@saruman.tx.rr.com> Message-ID: <20150513155012.GI15563@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Felipe Balbi [150513 08:32]: > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 07:40:02AM +0200, Lothar Wa?mann wrote: > > > > > Should these be ordered alphabetically? > > why ? In general the alphabetical ordering helps to avoid merge conflicts when new things are added later on as they are not all added to the end. So yeah I have a slight sorting preference there too to make my life easier in the future :) Regards, Tony