From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
Support Opensource <support.opensource@diasemi.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
Milo Kim <milo.kim@ti.com>,
patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: da9052: fix broken regulator probe
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 16:47:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150515144739.GC13976@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150514071943.GA20358@x1>
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 08:19:43AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2015, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 05:54:19PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Wed, 13 May 2015, Mark Brown wrote:
> >
> > > > If you're looking for me to review something you need to send it to me,
> > > > and the chances of me looking at it are very much increased if there's a
> > > > relevant subject line. I'm CCed (not even on the to list) on endless
> > > > large threads and reposts of patch serieses about MFD drivers most of
> > > > which are of very little relevance to me so they get ignored very
> > > > easily.
> >
> > > Calm down dear, it's only a commercial.
> >
> > > I wasn't having a pop. Rather empathising with your situation and
> > > facilitating a resend that you're likely to see.
> >
> > > I'm sure Johan will do the right thing.
> >
> > My point is that a simple resend has a reasonable chance of getting
> > dropped on the floor.
>
> As I say, I'm sure Johan will do what's required for that not to
> happen.
Seriously? *Me* do the right thing?
We have a regression in your subsystems (mfd/regulator) with a fix
that's been sitting in both your mailboxes since March 25th.
And now that Mark finally responds to a mail after repeated reminders
from both me and Lee, he still doesn't care enough to look up the
original mail or at least make sure that a resend does not get lost
again.
You two even work for the same organisation. Just pick up the phone or
find a way to get a message across that mail filter instead of wasting
everyone else's time.
I have resent the patch now. Please make sure it gets applied.
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-15 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-20 19:23 [PATCH v2 0/5] mfd: Fix platform device ids to avoid probe failure Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-03-20 19:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mfd: max8997: " Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-03-20 19:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mfd: da9055: " Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-03-20 19:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mfd: lp8788: " Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-03-20 19:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mfd: wm831x: " Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-03-20 19:23 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mfd: da9052: Fix platform device names Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-03-23 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] mfd: Fix platform device ids to avoid probe failure Johan Hovold
2015-03-23 13:11 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-03-25 11:02 ` Johan Hovold
2015-03-25 11:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] mfd: da9052: fix broken regulator probe Johan Hovold
2015-03-25 11:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] mfd: core: fix platform-device name collisions Johan Hovold
2015-03-25 12:02 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-03-26 8:34 ` Lee Jones
2015-03-25 12:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] mfd: da9052: fix broken regulator probe Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-03-26 8:32 ` Lee Jones
2015-04-14 13:04 ` Johan Hovold
2015-04-29 7:44 ` Johan Hovold
2015-04-29 8:41 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-13 15:43 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-13 16:08 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-13 16:54 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-13 17:29 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-14 7:19 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-15 14:47 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2015-05-18 9:10 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-18 9:51 ` Johan Hovold
2015-05-18 10:13 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-18 16:28 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-18 16:24 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-18 16:46 ` Johan Hovold
2015-05-18 18:46 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-19 10:01 ` Johan Hovold
2015-05-19 10:38 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-19 11:01 ` Johan Hovold
2015-05-19 12:01 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-15 14:27 ` [PATCH RESEND] " Johan Hovold
2015-05-18 18:47 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-18 18:57 ` Lee Jones
2015-03-30 7:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Lee Jones
2015-03-25 12:04 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] mfd: Fix platform device ids to avoid probe failure Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150515144739.GC13976@localhost \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=fabio.estevam@freescale.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=milo.kim@ti.com \
--cc=patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=support.opensource@diasemi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.