From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 15 May 2015 23:53:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:39681 "EHLO linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S27026747AbbEOVxojwHCl (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 May 2015 23:53:44 +0200 Received: from scotty.linux-mips.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.14.9/8.14.8) with ESMTP id t4FLrSAl011098; Fri, 15 May 2015 23:53:28 +0200 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t4FLrLJ6011097; Fri, 15 May 2015 23:53:21 +0200 Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 23:53:21 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Leonid Yegoshin Cc: aleksey.makarov@auriga.com, james.hogan@imgtec.com, paul.burton@imgtec.com, david.daney@cavium.com, peterz@infradead.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davidlohr@hp.com, kirill@shutemov.name, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MIPS64: Support of at least 48 bits of SEGBITS Message-ID: <20150515215320.GI2322@linux-mips.org> References: <20150515013351.7450.12130.stgit@ubuntu-yegoshin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150515013351.7450.12130.stgit@ubuntu-yegoshin> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 47424 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 06:34:43PM -0700, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: The order 1 allocation for the PGD are concerning me a little. On a system under even moderate memory pressure that might become a bit of a reliability or performance issue. With 4kB pages we already need order 1 or even 2 allocations for the allocation of the stack and some folks have reported that to be an issue so we may have to start using the PUD for very large VA spaces. Ralf