From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754366AbbERRgK (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2015 13:36:10 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:56556 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750801AbbERRgG (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2015 13:36:06 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 10:36:05 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: "Hans J. Koch" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] uio: add support for ioctl Message-ID: <20150518173605.GA30744@infradead.org> References: <20150518103136.73e48906@urahara> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150518103136.73e48906@urahara> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:31:36AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Allow UIO device specific driver to provide ioctl interface. > This mechanism is used in DPDK uio_msi driver to allow creating > VFIO like events. I can't find that driver anywhere in the kernel tree, and there is no point adding new hooks just for out of tree code that doesn't even get tested in tree.