From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: "Opensource [Steve Twiss]"
<stwiss.opensource-WBD+wuPFNBhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>,
LINUXKERNEL
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
LINUXWATCHDOG
<linux-watchdog-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim-IQzOog9fTRqzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>,
Alessandro Zummo
<a.zummo-BfzFCNDTiLLj+vYz1yj4TQ@public.gmane.org>,
DEVICETREE <devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
David Dajun Chen
<david.chen-WBD+wuPFNBhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Ian Campbell
<ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
LINUXINPUT <linux-input-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
RTCLINUX <rtc-linux-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>,
Support Opensource
<Support.Opensource-WBD+wuPFNBhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] RE: [PATCH V2 3/4] watchdog: da9062: DA9062 watchdog driver
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 19:39:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150518173927.GV3338@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ED8E3B22081A4459DAC7699F3695FB7014B22B8FE-68WUHU125fLzLL1Oxlh9IgLouzNaz+3S@public.gmane.org>
On 18/05/2015 at 16:03:06 +0000, Opensource [Steve Twiss] wrote :
> > Since the interrupt is optional, the driver should also not fail to load
> > if no interrupt is assigned to it in the first place.
>
> Yeah. I've been thinking about it and I agree now. I'll erase the handler.
>
> > On a separate note, there was a comment stating that the da9062 watchdog
> > is identical to the da9063 watchdog. If so, why can't you just use the da9063
> > watchdog driver ?
>
> Well, the short answer to this is, it's not the same. I was just in the process of
> replying to that other thread. The OnKey and RTC are functionally similar, so I
> am going to look at integrating the two drivers in some future patch sets, but
> the watchdog is definitely not based upon DA9063.
>
> I did mention this in a previous thread:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/6/505
>
Sure, what I understand is that the base functionality is the same and
even the registers are compatible. Are you sure the new features can't
be added to the da9063 and called conditionally? Plenty of drivers are
doing that.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: "Opensource [Steve Twiss]" <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
LINUXKERNEL <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
LINUXWATCHDOG <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
DEVICETREE <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
David Dajun Chen <david.chen@diasemi.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
LINUXINPUT <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
RTCLINUX <rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@diasemi.com>
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] RE: [PATCH V2 3/4] watchdog: da9062: DA9062 watchdog driver
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 19:39:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150518173927.GV3338@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ED8E3B22081A4459DAC7699F3695FB7014B22B8FE@SW-EX-MBX02.diasemi.com>
On 18/05/2015 at 16:03:06 +0000, Opensource [Steve Twiss] wrote :
> > Since the interrupt is optional, the driver should also not fail to load
> > if no interrupt is assigned to it in the first place.
>
> Yeah. I've been thinking about it and I agree now. I'll erase the handler.
>
> > On a separate note, there was a comment stating that the da9062 watchdog
> > is identical to the da9063 watchdog. If so, why can't you just use the da9063
> > watchdog driver ?
>
> Well, the short answer to this is, it's not the same. I was just in the process of
> replying to that other thread. The OnKey and RTC are functionally similar, so I
> am going to look at integrating the two drivers in some future patch sets, but
> the watchdog is definitely not based upon DA9063.
>
> I did mention this in a previous thread:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/6/505
>
Sure, what I understand is that the base functionality is the same and
even the registers are compatible. Are you sure the new features can't
be added to the da9063 and called conditionally? Plenty of drivers are
doing that.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: "Opensource [Steve Twiss]" <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
LINUXKERNEL <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
LINUXWATCHDOG <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
DEVICETREE <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
David Dajun Chen <david.chen@diasemi.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
LINUXINPUT <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
RTCLINUX <rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@diasemi.com>
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] RE: [PATCH V2 3/4] watchdog: da9062: DA9062 watchdog driver
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 19:39:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150518173927.GV3338@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ED8E3B22081A4459DAC7699F3695FB7014B22B8FE@SW-EX-MBX02.diasemi.com>
On 18/05/2015 at 16:03:06 +0000, Opensource [Steve Twiss] wrote :
> > Since the interrupt is optional, the driver should also not fail to load
> > if no interrupt is assigned to it in the first place.
>
> Yeah. I've been thinking about it and I agree now. I'll erase the handler.
>
> > On a separate note, there was a comment stating that the da9062 watchdog
> > is identical to the da9063 watchdog. If so, why can't you just use the da9063
> > watchdog driver ?
>
> Well, the short answer to this is, it's not the same. I was just in the process of
> replying to that other thread. The OnKey and RTC are functionally similar, so I
> am going to look at integrating the two drivers in some future patch sets, but
> the watchdog is definitely not based upon DA9063.
>
> I did mention this in a previous thread:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/6/505
>
Sure, what I understand is that the base functionality is the same and
even the registers are compatible. Are you sure the new features can't
be added to the da9063 and called conditionally? Plenty of drivers are
doing that.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-18 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-14 16:43 [PATCH V2 0/4] da9062: DA9062 driver submission S Twiss
2015-05-14 16:43 ` S Twiss
2015-05-14 16:43 ` [rtc-linux] " S Twiss
2015-05-14 16:43 ` [PATCH V2 1/4] mfd: da9062: DA9062 MFD core driver S Twiss
2015-05-14 16:43 ` [rtc-linux] " S Twiss
[not found] ` <af5a7d289bb149e9111ebc70bb0589a994ee2407.1431621833.git.stwiss.opensource-WBD+wuPFNBhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-16 8:53 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-05-16 8:53 ` Alexandre Belloni
[not found] ` <20150516085328.GI3338-m++hUPXGwpdeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-19 8:34 ` Opensource [Steve Twiss]
2015-05-19 8:34 ` Opensource [Steve Twiss]
2015-05-19 8:34 ` Opensource [Steve Twiss]
2015-05-14 16:43 ` [PATCH V2 2/4] regulator: da9062: DA9062 regulator driver S Twiss
2015-05-14 16:43 ` [rtc-linux] " S Twiss
[not found] ` <cover.1431621833.git.stwiss.opensource-WBD+wuPFNBhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-14 16:43 ` [PATCH V2 3/4] watchdog: da9062: DA9062 watchdog driver S Twiss
2015-05-14 16:43 ` S Twiss
2015-05-14 16:43 ` [rtc-linux] " S Twiss
[not found] ` <6a51f163b99edfad9165ad29609abb072dbaa2b7.1431621833.git.stwiss.opensource-WBD+wuPFNBhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-15 2:13 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-05-15 2:13 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-05-15 2:13 ` [rtc-linux] " Guenter Roeck
2015-05-15 8:13 ` Opensource [Steve Twiss]
2015-05-15 8:13 ` [rtc-linux] " Opensource [Steve Twiss]
2015-05-15 12:57 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-05-15 12:57 ` [rtc-linux] " Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <5555ED4F.5070003-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-15 15:35 ` Opensource [Steve Twiss]
2015-05-15 15:35 ` Opensource [Steve Twiss]
2015-05-15 15:35 ` [rtc-linux] " Opensource [Steve Twiss]
2015-05-15 20:20 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-05-15 20:20 ` [rtc-linux] " Guenter Roeck
2015-05-18 14:15 ` Opensource [Steve Twiss]
2015-05-18 14:15 ` [rtc-linux] " Opensource [Steve Twiss]
[not found] ` <6ED8E3B22081A4459DAC7699F3695FB7014B22B8C8-68WUHU125fLzLL1Oxlh9IgLouzNaz+3S@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-18 15:27 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-05-18 15:27 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-05-18 15:27 ` [rtc-linux] " Guenter Roeck
2015-05-18 16:03 ` Opensource [Steve Twiss]
2015-05-18 16:03 ` [rtc-linux] " Opensource [Steve Twiss]
[not found] ` <6ED8E3B22081A4459DAC7699F3695FB7014B22B8FE-68WUHU125fLzLL1Oxlh9IgLouzNaz+3S@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-18 17:39 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2015-05-18 17:39 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-05-18 17:39 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-05-19 10:16 ` Opensource [Steve Twiss]
2015-05-19 10:16 ` Opensource [Steve Twiss]
2015-05-16 0:46 ` [rtc-linux] [PATCH V2 0/4] da9062: DA9062 driver submission Alexandre Belloni
2015-05-16 0:46 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-05-18 14:23 ` Opensource [Steve Twiss]
2015-05-18 14:23 ` Opensource [Steve Twiss]
2015-05-14 16:43 ` [PATCH V2 4/4] devicetree: da9062: Add bindings for DA9062 driver S Twiss
2015-05-14 16:43 ` [rtc-linux] " S Twiss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150518173927.GV3338@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni-wi1+55scjutkeb57/3fjtnbpr1lh4cv8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Support.Opensource-WBD+wuPFNBhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=a.zummo-BfzFCNDTiLLj+vYz1yj4TQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=david.chen-WBD+wuPFNBhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lgirdwood-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-input-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rtc-linux-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sameo-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=stwiss.opensource-WBD+wuPFNBhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wim-IQzOog9fTRqzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.