From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pa0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::231]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YupaD-00017z-0H for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 19 May 2015 22:01:53 +0000 Received: by pacwv17 with SMTP id wv17so41309043pac.2 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 15:01:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 15:01:24 -0700 From: Brian Norris To: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] [RESEND] IFC: Change IO accessor based on endianness Message-ID: <20150519220124.GA11598@ld-irv-0074> References: <1431420591-20453-1-git-send-email-r65777@rhuath.am.freescale.net> <1431438951.16357.490.camel@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1431438951.16357.490.camel@freescale.com> Cc: arnd@arndb.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Bharat Bhushan , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, prabhakar@freescale.com, Jaiprakash Singh List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 08:55:51AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 03:49 -0500, Bharat Bhushan wrote: > > From: Jaiprakash Singh > > > > IFC IO accressor are set at run time based > > on IFC IP registers endianness.IFC node in > > DTS file contains information about > > endianness. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jaiprakash Singh > > --- > > Tested on T1040RDB, LS2085a, LS1 > > > > .../bindings/memory-controllers/fsl/ifc.txt | 3 + > > drivers/memory/fsl_ifc.c | 43 +++- > > drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_ifc_nand.c | 258 ++++++++++---------- > > include/linux/fsl_ifc.h | 50 ++++ > > 4 files changed, 213 insertions(+), 141 deletions(-) > > As before, > Acked-by: Scott Wood > > This touches MTD as well as dependencies outside MTD -- which tree > should it go through? I haven't actually seen the patch on linux-mtd. Were we CC'd? If not, please resend, and CC linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org. (Try scripts/get_maintainer.pl to find the right people/lists.) And is this the previous version? http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2014-November/056249.html I don't mind either tree. I don't think fsl_ifc_nand.c will have anything noisy in linux-mtd for this release cycle. Brian