From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] KVM: cleanups for memslots data structures
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 22:19:33 +0200
Message-ID: <20150520201932.GA10634@potion.brq.redhat.com>
References: <1432056313-36100-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
	Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1432056313-36100-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

2015-05-19 19:25+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
> These are extracted out of the SMM series, and they make
> some sense on their own.

[1-9/9] look good,
Reviewed-by: Radim Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99 <rkrcmar@redhat.com>

The only possible difference in behavior that I noticed was in
audit_write_protection [8/9], and it didn't affect much.