From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 02/14] remote.c: refactor setup of branch->merge list
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 00:45:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150521044509.GB23409@peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150521044429.GA5857@peff.net>
When we call branch_get() to lookup or create a "struct
branch", we make sure the "merge" field is filled in so that
callers can access it. But the conditions under which we do
so are a little confusing, and can lead to two funny
situations:
1. If there's no branch.*.remote config, we cannot provide
branch->merge (because it is really just an application
of branch.*.merge to our remote's refspecs). But
branch->merge_nr may be non-zero, leading callers to be
believe they can access branch->merge (e.g., in
branch_merge_matches and elsewhere).
It doesn't look like this can cause a segfault in
practice, as most code paths dealing with merge config
will bail early if there is no remote defined. But it's
a bit of a dangerous construct.
We can fix this by setting merge_nr to "0" explicitly
when we realize that we have no merge config. Note that
merge_nr also counts the "merge_name" fields (which we
_do_ have; that's how merge_nr got incremented), so we
will "lose" access to them, in the sense that we forget
how many we had. But no callers actually care; we use
merge_name only while iteratively reading the config,
and then convert it to the final "merge" form the first
time somebody calls branch_get().
2. We set up the "merge" field every time branch_get is
called, even if it has already been done. This leaks
memory.
It's not a big deal in practice, since most code paths
will access only one branch, or perhaps each branch
only one time. But if you want to be pathological, you
can leak arbitrary memory with:
yes @{upstream} | head -1000 | git rev-list --stdin
We can fix this by skipping setup when branch->merge is
already non-NULL.
In addition to those two fixes, this patch pushes the "do we
need to setup merge?" logic down into set_merge, where it is
a bit easier to follow.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
---
remote.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
index bec8b31..ac17e66 100644
--- a/remote.c
+++ b/remote.c
@@ -1636,6 +1636,19 @@ static void set_merge(struct branch *ret)
unsigned char sha1[20];
int i;
+ if (!ret)
+ return; /* no branch */
+ if (ret->merge)
+ return; /* already run */
+ if (!ret->remote_name || !ret->merge_nr) {
+ /*
+ * no merge config; let's make sure we don't confuse callers
+ * with a non-zero merge_nr but a NULL merge
+ */
+ ret->merge_nr = 0;
+ return;
+ }
+
ret->merge = xcalloc(ret->merge_nr, sizeof(*ret->merge));
for (i = 0; i < ret->merge_nr; i++) {
ret->merge[i] = xcalloc(1, sizeof(**ret->merge));
@@ -1660,11 +1673,9 @@ struct branch *branch_get(const char *name)
ret = current_branch;
else
ret = make_branch(name, 0);
- if (ret && ret->remote_name) {
+ if (ret && ret->remote_name)
ret->remote = remote_get(ret->remote_name);
- if (ret->merge_nr)
- set_merge(ret);
- }
+ set_merge(ret);
return ret;
}
--
2.4.1.528.g00591e3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-21 4:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-21 4:44 [PATCH v3 0/14] implement @{push} shorthand Jeff King
2015-05-21 4:45 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] remote.c: drop default_remote_name variable Jeff King
2015-05-21 4:45 ` Jeff King [this message]
2015-05-21 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] remote.c: refactor setup of branch->merge list Junio C Hamano
2015-05-21 4:45 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] remote.c: drop "remote" pointer from "struct branch" Jeff King
2015-05-21 4:45 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] remote.c: hoist branch.*.remote lookup out of remote_get_1 Jeff King
2015-05-21 4:45 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] remote.c: provide per-branch pushremote name Jeff King
2015-05-21 4:45 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] remote.c: hoist read_config into remote_get_1 Jeff King
2015-05-21 4:45 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] remote.c: introduce branch_get_upstream helper Jeff King
2015-05-21 18:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-05-21 18:14 ` Jeff King
2015-05-21 18:35 ` Jeff King
2015-05-21 19:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-05-21 4:45 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] remote.c: report specific errors from branch_get_upstream Jeff King
2015-05-21 18:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-05-21 18:49 ` Jeff King
2015-05-21 19:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-05-22 0:46 ` Jeff King
2015-05-22 0:49 ` Jeff King
2015-05-21 4:45 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] remote.c: add branch_get_push Jeff King
2015-05-21 4:45 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] sha1_name: refactor upstream_mark Jeff King
2015-05-21 4:45 ` [PATCH v3 11/14] sha1_name: refactor interpret_upstream_mark Jeff King
2015-05-21 4:45 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] sha1_name: implement @{push} shorthand Jeff King
2015-05-21 4:45 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] for-each-ref: use skip_prefix instead of starts_with Jeff King
2015-05-21 4:45 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] for-each-ref: accept "%(push)" format Jeff King
2015-05-21 4:52 ` [PATCH v3 0/14] implement @{push} shorthand Jeff King
2015-05-21 18:37 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150521044509.GB23409@peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.