From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
sboyd@codeaurora.org, prarit@redhat.com, skannan@codeaurora.org,
Srivatsa Bhat <srivatsa@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 09/14] cpufreq: add/remove sysfs links via cpufreq_add_remove_dev_symlink()
Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 09:11:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150523034120.GA4210@linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3403066.ABqM7b3uGI@vostro.rjw.lan>
On 23-05-15, 01:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> (The last statement line is likely longer than 80 chars, but that's fine.)
No, it isn't.
I am dropping this patch and merging it with the next one. Otherwise
it generates warnings about routine defined but not used. So I will be
resending 10/14 and that replaces 9-10/14.
Thanks.
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-23 3:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-18 5:13 [PATCH V5 00/14] cpufreq: Don't loose cpufreq history on CPU hotplug Viresh Kumar
2015-05-18 5:13 ` [PATCH V5 01/14] cpufreq: Create for_each_{in}active_policy() Viresh Kumar
2015-05-18 5:13 ` [PATCH V5 02/14] cpufreq: Don't clear cpufreq_cpu_data and policy list for inactive policies Viresh Kumar
2015-05-18 5:13 ` [PATCH V5 03/14] cpufreq: Get rid of cpufreq_cpu_data_fallback Viresh Kumar
2015-05-18 5:13 ` [PATCH V5 04/14] cpufreq: Don't traverse all active policies to find policy for a cpu Viresh Kumar
2015-05-18 5:13 ` [PATCH V5 05/14] cpufreq: Manage governor usage history with 'policy->last_governor' Viresh Kumar
2015-05-18 5:13 ` [PATCH V5 06/14] cpufreq: Mark policy->governor = NULL for inactive policies Viresh Kumar
2015-05-18 5:13 ` [PATCH V5 07/14] cpufreq: Don't allow updating inactive policies from sysfs Viresh Kumar
2015-05-18 5:13 ` [PATCH V5 08/14] cpufreq: Track cpu managing sysfs kobjects separately Viresh Kumar
2015-05-22 23:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-18 5:13 ` [PATCH V5 09/14] cpufreq: add/remove sysfs links via cpufreq_add_remove_dev_symlink() Viresh Kumar
2015-05-22 23:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-23 3:41 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2015-05-18 5:13 ` [PATCH V5 10/14] cpufreq: Stop migrating sysfs files on hotplug Viresh Kumar
2015-05-23 3:45 ` (unknown), Viresh Kumar
2015-05-23 4:34 ` [PATCH V6 10/14] cpufreq: Remove cpufreq_update_policy() Viresh Kumar
2015-05-18 5:13 ` [PATCH V5 11/14] " Viresh Kumar
2015-05-18 5:13 ` [PATCH V5 12/14] cpufreq: Initialize policy->kobj while allocating policy Viresh Kumar
2015-05-18 5:13 ` [PATCH V5 13/14] cpufreq: Call cpufreq_policy_put_kobj() from cpufreq_policy_free() Viresh Kumar
2015-05-18 5:13 ` [PATCH V5 14/14] cpufreq: Restart governor as soon as possible Viresh Kumar
2015-05-19 0:34 ` [PATCH V5 00/14] cpufreq: Don't loose cpufreq history on CPU hotplug Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-19 2:27 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150523034120.GA4210@linux \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=skannan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=srivatsa@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.