From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-ig0-f178.google.com ([209.85.213.178]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YxZGI-0006yC-VD for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 11:12:39 +0000 Received: by igbhj9 with SMTP id hj9so83777808igb.1 for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 04:12:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 07:12:11 -0400 From: Bob Copeland Subject: Re: attempting mesh on ath10k Message-ID: <20150527111211.GC6216@localhost> References: <20150424125055.GA27722@localhost> <553AEFFA.6010709@candelatech.com> <20150426141552.GA25938@localhost> <20150427130016.GA28926@localhost> <20150428122554.GA4527@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Bartosz Markowski Cc: "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 08:51:05AM +0200, Bartosz Markowski wrote: > On 28 April 2015 at 14:25, Bob Copeland wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 07:47:40AM +0200, Michal Kazior wrote: > >> > Perhaps there is a BSSID filter enabled or something like that (in mesh > >> > there's no BSSID, just individual addresses on group addressed frames). > >> > >> In that case try creating a monitor interface and bring it up. This > >> should prompt ath10k to create monitor vdev and subsequently disable > >> most Rx filters in firmware. > > Are there any plans to push this work upstream? Hi Bartosz, Yes, I plan to upstream it. I'm waiting on a hardware to arrive so I can implement VHT mesh with two ath10k chips; once that's in and working I'll clean it up and submit. -- Bob Copeland %% http://bobcopeland.com/ _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k