From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: riel@redhat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mgorman@suse.de,
jhladky@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org,
dedekind1@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] numa,sched: only consider less busy nodes as numa balancing destination
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 16:37:41 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150528110741.GA3370@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432753468-7785-3-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com>
* riel@redhat.com <riel@redhat.com> [2015-05-27 15:04:28]:
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index c47bf0dffb34..f655f2ad155d 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -1398,6 +1398,30 @@ static void task_numa_find_cpu(struct task_numa_env *env,
> }
> }
>
> +/* Only move tasks to a NUMA node less busy than the current node. */
> +static bool numa_has_capacity(struct task_numa_env *env)
> +{
> + struct numa_stats *src = &env->src_stats;
> + struct numa_stats *dst = &env->dst_stats;
> +
> + if (src->has_free_capacity && !dst->has_free_capacity)
> + return false;
> +
> + /*
> + * Only consider a task move if the source has a higher destination
> + * than the destination, corrected for CPU capacity on each node.
In the above comment, did you mean source has higher load than the
destination?
> + *
> + * src->load dst->load
> + * --------------------- vs ---------------------
> + * src->compute_capacity dst->compute_capacity
> + */
> + if (src->load * dst->compute_capacity >
> + dst->load * src->compute_capacity)
> + return true;
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
>
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-28 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-27 19:04 [PATCH 0/2] numa,sched: resolve conflict between load balancing and NUMA balancing riel
2015-05-27 19:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] revert 095bebf61a46 ("sched/numa: Do not move past the balance point if unbalanced") riel
2015-06-07 17:47 ` [tip:sched/core] Revert " tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2015-05-27 19:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] numa,sched: only consider less busy nodes as numa balancing destination riel
2015-05-28 8:29 ` Mel Gorman
2015-05-28 11:07 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2015-05-28 13:33 ` Rik van Riel
2015-05-28 13:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-28 13:52 ` [PATCH v2 " Rik van Riel
2015-06-07 17:47 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Only consider less busy nodes as numa balancing destinations tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2015-05-29 7:44 ` [PATCH 0/2] numa,sched: resolve conflict between load balancing and NUMA balancing Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150528110741.GA3370@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=jhladky@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.