From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the modules and tip trees
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 10:03:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150528170321.GH5989@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150528172507.31f6fc8c@canb.auug.org.au>
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 05:25:07PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in
> include/linux/rcupdate.h between commits 0a04b0166929 ("rcu: Move
> lockless_dereference() out of rcupdate.h") from the modules tree and
> c1ad348b452a ("tick: Nohz: Rework next timer evaluation") from the tip
> tree and commits 7d0ae8086b82 ("rcu: Convert ACCESS_ONCE() to
> READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE()") and 3382adbc1bb8 ("rcu: Eliminate a few
> CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL #ifdefs") from the rcu tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).
Thank you, Stephen!
Ingo, I can send you a pull request as is or I can merge c1ad348b452a
with v4.1-rc3, rebase my commits on top of that, and do another cycle
through -next. If I don't hear otherwise, I will be lazy and send as is,
so if you would prefer something different, please let me know.
Thanx, Paul
> I also had to add this merge fix patch:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 17:20:58 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] rcu: merge fix for Convert ACCESS_ONCE() to READ_ONCE() and
> WRITE_ONCE()
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
> include/linux/compiler.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h
> index ba91e5c88a32..f7e7235f3a91 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
> @@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ static __always_inline void __write_once_size(volatile void *p, void *res, int s
> */
> #define lockless_dereference(p) \
> ({ \
> - typeof(p) _________p1 = ACCESS_ONCE(p); \
> + typeof(p) _________p1 = READ_ONCE(p); \
> smp_read_barrier_depends(); /* Dependency order vs. p above. */ \
> (_________p1); \
> })
> --
> 2.1.4
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
>
> diff --cc include/linux/rcupdate.h
> index ed5f66464ab3,3a4d1bf430b1..000000000000
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@@ -1140,13 -1063,13 +1050,13 @@@ static inline notrace void rcu_read_unl
> #define kfree_rcu(ptr, rcu_head) \
> __kfree_rcu(&((ptr)->rcu_head), offsetof(typeof(*(ptr)), rcu_head))
>
> - #if defined(CONFIG_TINY_RCU) || defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL)
> + #ifdef CONFIG_TINY_RCU
> -static inline int rcu_needs_cpu(unsigned long *delta_jiffies)
> +static inline int rcu_needs_cpu(u64 basemono, u64 *nextevt)
> {
> - *delta_jiffies = ULONG_MAX;
> + *nextevt = KTIME_MAX;
> return 0;
> }
> - #endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_TINY_RCU) || defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL) */
> + #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TINY_RCU */
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL)
> static inline bool rcu_is_nocb_cpu(int cpu) { return true; }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-28 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-28 7:25 linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the modules and tip trees Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-28 17:03 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2015-05-29 6:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-29 12:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-23 23:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-06-24 0:09 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150528170321.GH5989@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.