From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Subject: Re: Crypto driver -DCP Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 15:02:59 +0200 Message-ID: <201505291502.59208.marex@denx.de> References: <554BBD05.3050807@freescale.com> <201505290329.59713.marex@denx.de> <20150529013211.GA15566@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jay Monkman , Linux Crypto Mailing List To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:45388 "EHLO mail-out.m-online.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752833AbbE2NDC (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2015 09:03:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150529013211.GA15566@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Friday, May 29, 2015 at 03:32:11 AM, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 03:29:59AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Friday, May 29, 2015 at 03:23:59 AM, Herbert Xu wrote: > > > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 03:00:35AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > My understanding (!) is that everyone should be able to use this key > > > > to encrypt/decrypt their data using the AES128 engine in the DCP. > > > > > > If that's the case just make it the key you use if setkey has never > > > been called. > > > > Shouldn't you always call setkey when using symetric crypto ? > > Normally yes but we don't require it so in this case it should > be fine. This does look somewhat hacky to me. Wouldn't it make more sense to add a CRYPTO_TFM_REQ flag ? Best regards, Marek Vasut