From: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 01/19] x86, mpx, xsave: Fix up bad get_xsave_addr() assumptions
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 15:34:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150529223455.E3D20FD8@viggo.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150529223454.564C1F9E@viggo.jf.intel.com>
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
get_xsave_addr() assumes that if an xsave bit is present in the
hardware (pcntxt_mask) that it is present in a given xsave
buffer. Due to an bug in the xsave code on all of the systems
that have MPX (and thus all the users of this code), that has
been a true assumption.
But, the bug is getting fixed, so our assumption is not going
to hold any more.
It's quite possible (and normal) for an enabled state to be
present on 'pcntxt_mask', but *not* in 'xstate_bv'. We need
to consult 'xstate_bv'.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff -puN arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c~consullt-xstate_bv arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c~consullt-xstate_bv 2015-05-27 09:32:14.540445571 -0700
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c 2015-05-27 09:32:14.543445706 -0700
@@ -382,19 +382,48 @@ void fpu__resume_cpu(void)
* This is the API that is called to get xstate address in either
* standard format or compacted format of xsave area.
*
+ * Note that if there is no data for the field in the xsave buffer
+ * this will return NULL.
+ *
* Inputs:
- * xsave: base address of the xsave area;
- * xstate: state which is defined in xsave.h (e.g. XSTATE_FP, XSTATE_SSE,
- * etc.)
+ * xstate: the thread's storage area for all FPU data
+ * xstate_feature: state which is defined in xsave.h (e.g.
+ * XSTATE_FP, XSTATE_SSE, etc...)
* Output:
- * address of the state in the xsave area.
+ * address of the state in the xsave area, or NULL if the
+ * field is not present in the xsave buffer.
*/
-void *get_xsave_addr(struct xregs_state *xsave, int xstate)
+void *get_xsave_addr(struct xregs_state *xsave, int xstate_feature)
{
- int feature = fls64(xstate) - 1;
- if (!test_bit(feature, (unsigned long *)&xfeatures_mask))
+ int feature_nr = fls64(xstate_feature) - 1;
+ /*
+ * Do we even *have* xsave state?
+ */
+ if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVE))
+ return NULL;
+
+ xsave = ¤t->thread.fpu.state.xsave;
+ /*
+ * We should not ever be requesting features that we
+ * have not enabled. Remember that pcntxt_mask is
+ * what we write to the XCR0 register.
+ */
+ WARN_ONCE(!(xfeatures_mask & xstate_feature),
+ "get of unsupported state");
+ /*
+ * This assumes the last 'xsave*' instruction to
+ * have requested that 'xstate_feature' be saved.
+ * If it did not, we might be seeing and old value
+ * of the field in the buffer.
+ *
+ * This can happen because the last 'xsave' did not
+ * request that this feature be saved (unlikely)
+ * or because the "init optimization" caused it
+ * to not be saved.
+ */
+ if (!(xsave->header.xfeatures & xstate_feature))
return NULL;
- return (void *)xsave + xstate_comp_offsets[feature];
+ return (void *)xsave + xstate_comp_offsets[feature_nr];
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_xsave_addr);
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-29 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-29 22:34 [PATCH 00/19] x86, mpx updates for 4.2 (take 8) Dave Hansen
2015-05-29 22:34 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2015-05-29 22:34 ` [PATCH 02/19] x86, fpu: Wrap get_xsave_addr() to make it safer Dave Hansen
2015-05-29 22:34 ` [PATCH 03/19] x86, mpx: Use new get_xsave_field_ptr() Dave Hansen
2015-05-29 22:34 ` [PATCH 05/19] x86, mpx: remove redundant MPX_BNDCFG_ADDR_MASK Dave Hansen
2015-05-29 22:34 ` [PATCH 04/19] x86, mpx: Cleanup: Do not pass task around when unnecessary Dave Hansen
2015-06-01 11:14 ` [PATCH 00/19] x86, mpx updates for 4.2 (take 8) Ingo Molnar
2015-06-01 15:09 ` Dave Hansen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-06-07 18:37 [PATCH 00/19] x86, mpx updates for 4.2 (take 9) Dave Hansen
2015-06-07 18:37 ` [PATCH 01/19] x86, mpx, xsave: Fix up bad get_xsave_addr() assumptions Dave Hansen
2015-05-27 18:36 [PATCH 00/19] x86, mpx updates for 4.2 (take 8) Dave Hansen
2015-05-27 18:36 ` [PATCH 01/19] x86, mpx, xsave: Fix up bad get_xsave_addr() assumptions Dave Hansen
2015-05-19 6:25 [PATCH 00/19] x86, mpx updates for 4.2 (take 7) Dave Hansen
2015-05-19 6:25 ` [PATCH 01/19] x86, mpx, xsave: Fix up bad get_xsave_addr() assumptions Dave Hansen
2015-05-08 18:59 [PATCH 00/19] x86, mpx updates for 4.2 (take 6) Dave Hansen
2015-05-08 18:59 ` [PATCH 01/19] x86, mpx, xsave: fix up bad get_xsave_addr() assumptions Dave Hansen
2015-05-18 19:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150529223455.E3D20FD8@viggo.jf.intel.com \
--to=dave@sr71.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.